:RANK COMMENTS:

101 replies [Last post]
11. November 2012 - 14:15
#91
*ZMB*INEED$*
spraw's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts:
Re: :RANK COMMENTS:

This rule will stay because some clans abuse it in past. Rank is updated more frequent than in the past and i don't see a problem in making two clicks on forum to check against who did you play last mach. You said there is small number of clans so it's easier to remember who did you played last time.


Top
11. November 2012 - 16:50
#92
NanamoOOon
Offline
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts:
Re: :RANK COMMENTS:
*ZMB*INEED$* wrote:

This rule will stay because some clans abuse it in past. Rank is updated more frequent than in the past and i don't see a problem in making two clicks on forum to check against who did you play last mach. You said there is small number of clans so it's easier to remember who did you played last time.

Some abuses have been made in the past? really? I'm not even sure I was there back then (so it was at least 4 (!!!!) years ago) and since we are now using Elo system we can't comit those abuses anymore or at least not with real profit (wasn't it the point to implement this counting system?).
So please give us a real god reason, as already said almost a year ago, the reason you are giving (abuses) is outdated.

If you don't see anything wrong here, I do. Yes I have a problem with that rule and with the fact we have to check forum everytime we want to play a game. When you have 2 clans agree to play together a random cw (and this is really really rare), let just them play for game sake! And no this is not easy to remember who we played with last time when it's older than 2 weeks.
How can people defend such a rule when there is 4 (probably not even 4) clans who like to play cw outside leagues/cups ... we don't need that kind of limit.

I want to be allowed to play vs who I want, when I want and in the gametype I want.
I want to be allowed to play a return game and even a third if 1-1.
I want to be able to play a game after long time without having to check vs who I am or not allowed to play.

80% of the clans won't even notice if you delete that rule, why? Because you have to want to play ouside of cup to be concern by it.

If a rule is obsolete let's just delete/update it.
I can't believe I am the only one to whom this rule doesn't fit anymore. Speak up people! I don't want it to become Sp vs me, I have nothing against him personally.






Top
11. November 2012 - 18:25
#93
Rayden was here
georgekotz's picture
Offline
Joined: May 2010
Posts:
Re: :RANK COMMENTS:

SP - Nana, SP - nana, Sp - Nana ..... hmmmm what i will vote? Big grin
I will throw a coin to see what i will dicide, head will be SP and numbers will be nana. Big grin
Enough joking.... Big grin
The truth is Rank needs update but i see SP is the only active Rank mod lately and he didnt join rank to take dicisions and change rank. He only joined to help update the rank section of the site coz Fps started to became lazy lately Big grin
If SP thinks he can take control of the Ranking alone and try to fix things then he is welcome for me, if he wants ofc Happy

Real life is more important then Virtual life
Dont forget that

Top
11. November 2012 - 21:13
#94
Loxotron
Offline
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts:
Re: :RANK COMMENTS:

Agree with Nana, the rule dont make any sence. If you havent got any time limit between matches, precise amount of matches per week - your elo system isnt working as intended anyway, so why the hell you need this rule? You still can abuse it with 3 clans same as with 2 before, so what is the meaning?.

Top
28. December 2012 - 14:12
#95
BAC**TRB
trb's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts:
Re: :RANK COMMENTS:


if i get it right then that should show the percentage of playing the maps and shouldnt be over 100% (railonly 1v1 ranks)

silence is better than bullshit

Top
28. December 2012 - 14:16
#96
BAC**TRB
trb's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts:
Re: :RANK COMMENTS:

you should make :RAILONLY RANK COMMENTS: and :PLUS RANK COMMENTS: since its easy to get lost and post to wrong place as i did. (please move my post mods)

silence is better than bullshit

Top
28. December 2012 - 14:28
#97
*ZMB*INEED$*
spraw's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts:
Re: :RANK COMMENTS:

You just misread the info. Example:

q3dm17 was played 21 times in total. 16 times out of 21 was played as a tie which is 76%.

http://www.percentagecalculator.net/


Top
28. December 2012 - 14:39
#98
BAC**TRB
trb's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts:
Re: :RANK COMMENTS:
*ZMB*INEED$* wrote:

You just misread the info. Example:

q3dm17 was played 21 times in total. 16 times out of 21 was played as a tie which is 76%.

http://www.percentagecalculator.net/

i see your point now i tought its the same system like on normal maps. like there is on 5maps played overall=100% in case of tie and normal maps 14played maps=100%

silence is better than bullshit

Top
28. December 2012 - 16:11
#99
epsiplayer
THE ONE AND ONLY
intact-epsilon's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts:
Re: :RANK COMMENTS:
thomasyea wrote:

*ZMB*INEED$* wrote:
You just misread the info. Example:

q3dm17 was played 21 times in total. 16 times out of 21 was played as a tie which is 76%.

http://www.percentagecalculator.net/

i see your point now i tought its the same system like on normal maps. like there is on 5maps played overall=100% in case of tie and normal maps 14played maps=100%

About statistics in temp rank talk with me cause i'm the developer responsible with them.

I think its ok that you posted it in general Rank Comments, because doesn't matter if happen in plus/railonly since everywhere these map stats are calculated using the same forumula.

I understand now that Played as Tie % is counter intuitive and it doesn't reflect the same judgement as the Total Playerd %.
I thought that will be more helpful to post the % like this but i can change them. No problem.
I will fix this.
___________
epsislow


Top
2. June 2014 - 13:45
#100
rUnThEoN?!
Skullheadq3's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
DE Germany
Re: :RANK COMMENTS:
cml wrote:


Clan PHOENIX
gets YELLOW CARD
Reason: for letting permanently banned player to play Ranked Matches
Leco aka PHNX /// Under

Actually shouldn't they get a second yellow for not sorting out the permanentban for paradise?
Every Clanleader has to check Banned list on recruitment.

So even if List wasn't updated (I can't find any info about it) it doesn't change the fact they didn't check the list. D:

hurrenson: "This idiot is apparently not familiar with a rail/sniper style."

Top