:RANK COMMENTS:

101 replies [Last post]

5. December 2010 - 23:12

#31

Offline

Joined: Dec 2005

Posts:

Germany

Re: :RANK COMMENTS:

i just want to point out, beside the crap rule that has been introduced and definitly should be reverted as long as its no precise good universal solution, the problem mentioned is a true problem.

basically you have to differ between stable lag and unstable lag, first lag is lame, second is unplayable for the person.

hurrenson: "This idiot is apparently not familiar with a rail/sniper style."

6. December 2010 - 0:30

#32

Offline

Joined: Feb 2010

Posts:

Re: :RANK COMMENTS:

@illca and with who u think asphys talked about that game to make decisions?

anyway the rule will not be changed as many clans writed us in pm askins to take mesures for this.
And i personaly experimented this problem in cw vs other clan, so we know good what we are talking about illca

Gloria Mōmentum
^{“Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships.”}

“There is no hunting like the hunting of man, and those who have hunted armed men long enough and liked it, never care for anything else thereafter.”
—Ernest Hemingway

6. December 2010 - 0:50

#33

Offline

Joined: Apr 2009

Posts:

Re: :RANK COMMENTS:

Illca and the rest of gayzorz who always complain about Rose and Dark. They try their best for you all, and Im sure 100% that even if of all that you all making shit off your stink mouth, someone proposed or maked from the oldschool players (for you gods) you will not say a shit about it. Because of your kid and stupid logic, trying to be against the peopel who YOU dont like, but taking into into account, that you are idiots and dunce.

Thanks for this peopel with intusiasm as are Rose and Dark in e+ still can survive, also maybe take a new players and grow in popularity. So keep the mouth close skunks, specialy Illca and go to play on beer or other your friends gayzors like shadow, ligas and the rest,and your ''old scholl players'' they will not work on this, becasue of one reason...they are old. They have famely, work, study and lazy.

6. December 2010 - 1:03

#34

Offline

Joined: Mar 2008

Posts:

Re: :RANK COMMENTS:

roni as usually angry, but hes right. They work, they post news every month, they rank a lot of CWs from theese events, they work for ref team, they work for ranking rules to avoid missunderstanding at cw and they dont forget to answer on shit replyes of angry nabcakes which allways trying to find some shit inside. even Im tired to read theese coments with personal negativity and rude behavior.

edit: about this rule, I think its right, but I think there cant be a one description for lagging, I suggest to give a right to referee to force this player into spect, if by his opinion and agreence with opponent team, this player makes game unfair.

6. December 2010 - 13:48

#35

Offline

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts:

Re: :RANK COMMENTS:

wrote:

P.S. smotri kak bi opeati tvoi slova ne obernulisi bokom:) o vi na6 velikii vseznaika

Omg it's ALEIN LANGUAGE admin delete thread and ban plz IT IS BREAK RULE>

6. December 2010 - 14:02

#36

Offline

Joined: Nov 2003

Posts:

Re: :RANK COMMENTS:

wrote:

wrote:
P.S. smotri kak bi opeati tvoi slova ne obernulisi bokom:) o vi na6 velikii vseznaika

Omg it's ALEIN LANGUAGE admin delete thread and ban plz IT IS BREAK RULE>

yea, 1/3 warning!!!!

@roni, BULLSHIT, i pretty much like rose and darky, which doesn't mean i need to be the same oppinion

@fps
look who is speaking.... The moralizer, the upholder of moral standards, go go go, 2-face.

@topic again
It is getting complilcated more and more. In 2 years u must fullfil a huge list which need to get approved by easy+ before a cw can be played. And this all just works more or less as long we have serverpayers who offer their servers for wars according to the rules. How this all is working if those serverowners break away and we have to play like in 2004/2005 or before, when wars were played on public servers...

6. December 2010 - 14:57

#37

Offline

Joined: Mar 2008

Posts:

Re: :RANK COMMENTS:

wrote:

@fps
look who is speaking.... The moralizer, the upholder of moral standards, go go go, 2-face.

look whos again here, the spamer and the useless ex-mod, if you were dumb and worked sux that doesnt mean that everyone follows u, some people do great job and got respect even from such morale person like I am.

6. December 2010 - 15:10

#38

Offline

Joined: Nov 2003

Posts:

Re: :RANK COMMENTS:

wrote:

wrote:
@fps

look who is speaking.... The moralizer, the upholder of moral standards, go go go, 2-face.

...gibberish...

Sorry, i am not able to understand even the

half of this post...

6. December 2010 - 15:14

#39

Offline

Joined: Mar 2008

Posts:

Re: :RANK COMMENTS:

yes thats what I ve mentioned before, you arent able to read and understand nothing, while u were beeing ex mod you were acting like a cunt, with subjective opinion based on personal negativity on a person. You r just putting ur big nose in every hole and trying to show how experienced and intellegent you are, you didnt deserve a respect for u "great work" and now getting angry that another people which do this work much better got it, get lost.