wrote:

P.S. for all ppl (specially 3 tvl here). Don't be excited when U don't know details

Im not excited. I just said what I think. I dont know more details but that's why I didnt say more detaily post.

uff, katipan, i have the "impression", that u misread what i wrote.

problem is not e5 : e5r or e5r e6 or e6 : e5, Problem which "can" but not must arise ist "bro/plus : e5/e5r/e6.

Fazit:
Ascari can not play e5/e5r/e5-wars for DS and no bro/plus/deex/etc-wars for kod.

but he can e5/bla/bla for kod and bro/bla/bla for DS.

This is all.

Man u guys are so complicated.

The "eventual" problem is so bro/e5 and not something else.

Why u guys think so hard, if it is better to think the easy way.

wrote:

TVL - e6,

no way

Katipan, I don't think this is such a great idea. In fact, the way it is now it's ok to me. If there would have been over 50 clans, I think that your idea would have worked, but it's impossible when e5 community is made of 15 clans. For example ><plays>< or ZER or others).

It is a bit weird indeed that the battle for the first place is between a e5 clan and a e6 clan, but this is something less important.

There is one more argument to why the rankings should stay this way. It's because the difference between these configs is in fact very very small. We like to think that if the sg damage is lowered by 10, it is totally another config. So wrong. The difference between e5/e5r is just the rail, which is a lot more important thing than the difference between e5/e6 configs which is the switch time and 3 more damage added to the mg. Come on guys, it's not such a big thing.

I agree that for players who only switch weapon for killing e6 is senseless, but this does not mean it's totally different. I've been playing this config for 3 years and I don't see such a big difference. In fact, these 2 configs are the same to me, to be honest. I feel like e5 and e6 are more alike than e5 and e5r in terms of gameplay (that is medium gameplay, not insanely ultra fast switch gameplay).

I do not blame those who like to switch, it's something you can do in e5 and if you don't like e6 because of this, I think it's ok not to play it, but to say it is shit and totally different is totally not true. Can we get along, please? I think it would be interesting to start a sticky topic about this where clan leaders will agree on a solution so this stupid talk will end once and for all. For example, if the majority agrees to create 2 distinct ladders, ok, so be it, if you really enjoy playing in a 4-clan ladder. On the other hand, if the majority agrees to have a common ladder, then all e5 clans will be ranked in the same ladder. Anyways, there's been too much offtopic in each cw topic about this.

Kinetic if u have power for keeping 'e5' good luck, still will be here offtopic iam sure. I prefer funy games with few clans than crying ppl after fw cw or any game about 'switch mg rail noobs...'

wrote:

It is a bit weird indeed that the battle for the first place is between a e5 clan and a e6 clan, but this is something less important.

There is one more argument to why the rankings should stay this way. It's because the difference between these configs is in fact very very small. We like to think that if the sg damage is lowered by 10, it is totally another config. So wrong. The difference between e5/e5r is just the rail, which is a lot more important thing than the difference between e5/e6 configs which is the switch time and 3 more damage added to the mg. Come on guys, it's not such a big thing.

I agree that for players who only switch weapon for killing e6 is senseless, but this does not mean it's totally different. I've been playing this config for 3 years and I don't see such a big difference. In fact, these 2 configs are the same to me, to be honest. I feel like e5 and e6 are more alike than e5 and e5r in terms of gameplay (that is medium gameplay, not insanely ultra fast switch gameplay).

I do not blame those who like to switch, it's something you can do in e5 and if you don't like e6 because of this, I think it's ok not to play it, but to say it is shit and totally different is totally not true. Can we get along, please? I think it would be interesting to start a sticky topic about this where clan leaders will agree on a solution so this stupid talk will end once and for all. For example, if the majority agrees to create 2 distinct ladders, ok, so be it, if you really enjoy playing in a 4-clan ladder. On the other hand, if the majority agrees to have a common ladder, then all e5 clans will be ranked in the same ladder. Anyways, there's been too much offtopic in each cw topic about this.

Your opinions about e5 e6 diference iam not sharing with u.

i writen in previous post:
imo, just imo - e6 is too far from e5 and plus.cfg too, maybe e6 is more 'bro' cfg than 'e5'

And i didnt said that e6 is shit, iam not shamefully to e6 ! In my posts isn't somewhere writen that e5 or e6 is bad, just because u know me, u know that i like e5. I just spoken that cfgs diferences (big or small) r roots in opinions splited 'e5'. U more comparing here e5 e6 diferences, but this is not solving 'offtopics' u just forcing e6 as e5 cfg. We all have choice, play e6 or no. Like to e5 we can say yes or no.

Finished for me, isn't free time for it. U know my opinion, i can't discuss still here about, if u want something to do for better comunity, i think u should listen ppl, follow stats u must see it in.

from e5/e5r/e6 clan members only survey

I like e6
25.9 % (14) Yes
20.4 % (11) -
53.7 % (29) No

I want league with more configs in
16.7 % (9) Yes
33.3 % (18 ) -
50 % (27) No

I want play e6 (in league)
25.9 % (14) Yes
11.1 % (6) -
63 % (34) No

54 plp isnt much but this sample already giving us good information, 63% ppl from this sample dont want play e6 in league, i dont know if they see big or small diferences in cfgs, i see just that majority said NO to e6 in league.