@Jab: sometimes in order to speak about a little point, lots of explanations and clarifications could be required in order to make sure whom one is aiming that point at would be to the level of understanding in order to be sure it can be easy for that little point to be understood by..

@Diablo: you are speaking in general.. while having no idea what has gone around.. just making assumptions. that is not enough to make a conclusion.. you need years of experience around what kind of a person paga is.. what kind of a person para is.. then assumptions still might not work and could have 50% possibility to be wrong unless you are sure what was going on and how things went at the moment the event has occurred.

All in all.. para made a request for owners and admins to track the event and see how if paga was an oppressor at the matter of banning para from serwer.. simply admins can see how true or false that is by referring to logs.. then case is solved and closed..

With regards to what I said, that is based on the knowledge of the two persons and the many hours spent in the server with the two of them.

I tried to phrase that carefully but looks like I did fail at it. I intentionally wrote caught on suspected cheating and not simply cheating, since I wanted to avoid taking either side in that old thread in this discussion. Sorry, if it came out as I was agreeing with that, I tried to be as neutral about it as I could.

wrote:

I forgot to bla bla bla

ah boring, same shit over again, nothing new, u telling same stuff under different colors, anyway im not saying this para is a clean or polite person or smart or HE IS DOIN GOOD WHAT HE DOIN, u guys got me wrong, personally i bet if i go on server n see what he does i'll be saying also that hes retard n says bullshits, but guess what, still my opinion is far away from banning a person or putting gay rules about being snob and polite as a priest on a public q3 server. about pedophile n other shit, as u can read, it's been jokes, even kersy wrote it, so ppl knows it's jokes, just "prolly" they get ah goddamn im lazy...fuck off im sleepy as shit, each time u answer, re-read one of my previous comments and take it as constant answer...boring as fuck, good day.

as most people noticed, this is beginning to circle around nothing.

just wanted to state again that im not exactly trying to take sides. its more that i can understand both sides (the ban and the upset). there's no definite right and wrong here imo, just certain decisions that lead to certain results.

tbh i cant read diablos comments because of the lack of paragraphs^^ but his quote post showed pretty much that theres enough contradicting opinions in this community to justify a rather balanced approach on the "trashtalk" topic. lets just say para crossed the line and set a vague mark on how far you can or can not go, is that fair, for future reference?

or maybe just /thread and everyone move on

wrote:

Para wanted public involved in his problem, so it is in forum, so everybody can make an opinion I would say that 'pseudo' admins are not performing well allways, by my experience sometimes they used to overact

Saw where that "everybody can make an opinion" way of thinking lead us ? To a 7 pages thread where we keep on diverging from the main issue and where people that had nothing to do with it on the first place are now trying to give their two cents.

That's what I meant about keep it private, kinda wanted to avoid such futilities for everyone.