Trial members rule

66 replies [Last post]
23. December 2011 - 8:04
#61
equinox
Offline
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts:
RS Serbia
Re: Trial members rule

F1 terror. Mods should clean all the dead teams/clans from database ,and its obvious which ones are dead and which are active.


Top
23. December 2011 - 10:55
#62
JUMPS'FPS!
fps's picture
Offline
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts:
Re: Trial members rule

Since when has it become bad if the trials listed as a special members in DB? It would cause only mess if we'd to force leaders remove trials from it.
I never saw that kind of clanmembers evoked any problems.

Btw, Impius, do you really think that way? I was able to non-watch this topic at all, due only one clan were complaining. Did I? I was checking every opinion and evenmore I listened/answered to all of them and changed a rule which now fits everyone.

This topic is still alive, and we with fate checking it daily. If there are existing another opinions about trials we take it in mind.

Rank was outdated to 2010. National ranking wasnt created at all. Individual ranking was going to be dead due to 12 unranked pages. Evenmore because of some ex-rankmod idea about creating a "global clans" I had to re-rank a lot of matches due to the biggest mess inside system.

You have no idea how big was a job we did last two monthes. After all of it, the biggest inactive old e+ troll is telling me, that I dont care about community and bullshiting around with big ego? I will not insult you now, just in case if I see ur offtopic aimed to one person comments at the rank-related topics, I will delete it and request a warning for you. End of story.

Top
23. December 2011 - 12:43
#63
eu.jeff
jeffrey's picture
Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts:
NL Netherlands
Re: Trial members rule
!@#$%&*( terror )_ wrote:

I got so confused that I don't know which one should I join Sad

Who wants you anyway ? /ragequit !

Top
23. December 2011 - 13:00
#64
!@#$%&*( terror )_
terror's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts:
Re: Trial members rule
eu.jeff wrote:

!@#$%&*( terror )_ wrote:
I got so confused that I don't know which one should I join Sad

Who wants you anyway ? /ragequit !

Tongue I'm not /ragequit I'm /boredquit Tongue

Top
23. December 2011 - 14:47
#65
THC * FATE
Retired Rank Moderator
Offline
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts:
Re: Trial members rule

Clan leaders has the full right to distinguish how their trial players are perceived by players not related to their clans. It is up to clan leaders either to mark trial players with different clan tags/colours or leave this matter inside their clan. This rule is dedicated only for the first mentioned kind of trial players, who's clan leaders decided to separate visually (or in any other way) full members of the clan from the trial members. This rule was introduced mainly to prevent having two separate divisions (BBS and BBS-T for example) being treated as a single clan.

Also Mow, please leave this personal matter outside this thread. If you would like to send a complaint on our work please create another thread dedicated to this problem. I may assure you that we will look into any technical issues mentioned.

fate/R.M.

Top
23. December 2011 - 15:21
#66
rUnThEoN?!
Skullheadq3's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
DE Germany
Re: Trial members rule

what mow is trying to say is that people will always find a way to bypass stuff. - For example instead of trials you can do a subclan which is fully independent home for trials being allowed to play. Thats why those rules are obsolete.

I introduced the trials rules in past as I already mentioned, for the responsibility of new members. There was a case about that back in the days which I atm can not remember.

hurrenson: "This idiot is apparently not familiar with a rail/sniper style."

Top