wrote:

problem is, i seen on spider it was pb and pure, but i cant skip the rule, sry
if there is a solution with not posting demo's, i gonna find it, but ds would be really sporty if they post their demo's of the warmups

hey skull !
i asked DEA*DS she has not any demos and she think DS has not any DEMOS .
YES its rule to make a demo but could someone tell me wth we need a DEMO? i had the fucking demo i just overwrite them by recording new demos. the person who created this rule must tell me "what a DEMOS can proof what we cant " in this cw there was np by both side. i think demo is needed if there is a trouble . so plz explain me why is a demo needed i hope WE -> ( DS/HYPER ) can tell you the infos what you need . i dont say posting demos are bad, i guess it has a special reason for sure. but in this fact i see no good reason to post demos. as i said it was a clean good cw .

wrote:

demo is needed to prove that pure was on.

better start your project with servers for cws eaither leaders will get nuts with so much rules

wrote:

demo is needed to prove that pure was on.

But, if the ranking assistant himself, can testify and prove, as he admitted he saw with his own eyes, that pure and pb were on, isn't that just as good?

Don't be so strict and bureaucratic. It's not about the means, it's about the end they lead to, and in this case, it's proving pb and pure were on. Which everyone knows by now, they were indeed on, and this is all a pointless discussion about a technicality.

The point is, a ranking assistant saw that the game was played in a pb 1, pure 1 environment. This is at least as good a proof as a demo, and i see no reason why it shouldn't be treated the same.

Wishful thinking, but, considering the circumstances, that would be stupid. IE. neither clan has any problems with the way the war was played, it was played on a 'safe' server, and Skullface is positive that everything was okay.

So, yeah.