RKT :2 HTK/17.06.07

94 replies [Last post]

22. June 2007 - 14:09

#71

Offline

Joined: Dec 2005

Posts:

® RKT :2 HTK/17.06.07

wrote:

wrote:
wrote:
synapse, a word of advice, up up down down left right left right b a start.

LMFAO

am i the only one who got this? Am i such a nerd?

bahahaha

hahaaa i got it
(old school way of cheating on super nes and master system)

we are the 1337!

Dark Angels Forum - ClanDB | GBR National Team - ClanDB | Mystery of X Website - ClanDB

22. June 2007 - 14:26

#72

Offline

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts:

® RKT :2 HTK/17.06.07

Did someone said "geek"? Because i think i heard someone said "geek".

Mowlol has a point, wars in which cheaters played shouldn't be ranked out of principle, never mind if the cheaters team won or lost.

22. June 2007 - 15:28

#73

Offline

Joined: Jan 2004

Posts:

® RKT :2 HTK/17.06.07

im think all games with chaters involved should be ranked as WO games, ofc rest of member might dont know he downloaded chat during membership, but then atleast they will kep more atention.

im think clan/team with chater inside should be punished by WO

we arent tolerate cheating in eny signs and "lore" we use for these kind of sytuations should make serious doubds for trying to cheat in everyone head

like in *mafia* if yors life for u dosent count at all, life of yors famili will do

22. June 2007 - 16:11

#74

Offline

Joined: Jul 2006

Posts:

® RKT :2 HTK/17.06.07

wow u guys want to rank it
out of your mind?

look at yourself who said there was only 1 cheater?
without offence if there was cheating possible on server
there could be more sneakers on server in both teams
u catched 1 so that mean cw cant be f ranked
no matter if its wo or other it just not clean.
dont even think about ranking cw's where were cheats enabled !

@If rest of members[including leader] didnt know that he has got cheater in clan its his problem next time he will check new members deeper.
dunno how u but i trust my ppl i can give my hand for each of them
and u can cut it if any of them will be catched on cheating [without my knowledge ]

22. June 2007 - 16:32

#75

Offline

Joined: Jan 2004

Posts:

® RKT :2 HTK/17.06.07

there were played planty cw withnout pure on, we should not rank all these cw couse we dont have sure all was clear, right to yors sugestion.

iven more if pure na pb are enabled we still dont know if all was fully clear couse it is posible to surpas that, sorry but this starting to sound more like *paranoya*

btw, im alredy maked place for both of yors hands

22. June 2007 - 16:47

#76

Offline

Joined: Jul 2006

Posts:

® RKT :2 HTK/17.06.07

but u see hq this one wasnt clean at all for SURE
other wars u said:
if there wasnt any problems on cw i dont see reasons to suspect that it wasnt clean even with pb and pure off.
do you understand me now clear?

22. June 2007 - 17:10

#77

Offline

Joined: Jan 2004

Posts:

® RKT :2 HTK/17.06.07

no i dont, couse nobody know if somebody was cheating in both sytuations, one busted person dont mean that rest also might cheating, and otherwise when u bust 3 members on cheating that dosent means that the rest also cheaten

and when u starting to suspect sudently all member its a deep shit like paranoya

22. June 2007 - 17:20

#78

Offline

Joined: Jul 2006

Posts:

® RKT :2 HTK/17.06.07

if on cw[normal] nobody havent got any suspicious
u dont need to look for cheaters there bcoz players which played there did well and look at theirself. but when u see a cheater on ranking match and this cheater wasnt catched at cw but after it u have to imagine that not only he could play with toys there the probability is much higher in that case.
it also mean that securities failed on that cw and it must be deal like non secured cw.

22. June 2007 - 18:27

#79

Offline

Joined: Nov 2005

Posts:

® RKT :2 HTK/17.06.07

What then we should do with all CWs which are already played in E5 with pure off ? Trust me huge majority of CWs was played with pure off. Nowhere in rules aren't obligation playing with PB ON and PURE ON. Because long time in one huge tread we all find out that is impossible on screens see is it PURE and PB was on... So, we give up from idea to enforce rules on that way. Maybe in future E+ release we will have that feature on screens. Since then clans can play as they like. Sure recommendations that PB and PURE is more then welcome. BRO play 99% CWs on PB AND PURE ON.

E5 have "some kind of traditions" to use skins etc... So, they now play most CWs with PB ON and pure off. Of course progress are maded because before they play OFF both stuff mostly because of "PB lags".

I am absolutely for PB ON and PURE ON. But if some E5 clans wanna cheat each others let them be.

BBSQUAD CLAN
- All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die...

22. June 2007 - 20:29

#80

Offline

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts:

® RKT :2 HTK/17.06.07

wrote:

Maybe in future E+ release we will have that feature on screens

Actually, that's a VERY good idea. Two small points on the scoreboard which show wether PB and PURE are activated on the server.

I do remember some situations where the thread poster said that pb and pure is off but later it came out that one or both of them were off during the war...