NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

69 replies [Last post]
fala'fag
dancing shadow's picture
Offline
Joined: May 2008
Posts:
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

yes mandriva has good fps but it's boots up once per 100 times

censorship on YouTube sucks rabbit balls

officiallydead
Offline
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts:
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

here is my test Happy

Intel core 2 duo E8500 @3.16 GHZ
Asus p5q-E
4GB 400Hz
GTX 280
Directx 10
Vista Basic Home Tongue + sp1 (sp1 i think Tongue)

Anti-Aliasing x8 and Anisotropic x16

1,7 sec - 732.7 Fps

Anti-Aliasing x^4 and Anisotropic x8

1,7 759.5 fps

dont know if i made them right Big grin but ok Big grin

joey
Offline
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts:
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test
officiallydead wrote:

here is my test Happy

Intel core 2 duo E8500 @3.16 GHZ
Asus p5q-E
4GB 400Hz
GTX 280
Directx 10
Vista Basic Home Tongue + sp1 (sp1 i think Tongue)

Anti-Aliasing x8 and Anisotropic x16

1,7 sec - 732.7 Fps

Anti-Aliasing x^4 and Anisotropic x8

1,7 759.5 fps

dont know if i made them right Big grin but ok Big grin

The 280 is DEFINITELY capable of much higher ratings...

officiallydead
Offline
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts:
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

well i am sure that 280 is much more capable maybe i am too dumb Big grinLaughing out loud every game plays so i dont really bother Big grin however i have to say

that i deactivated physx settings maybe thats why the fps are relatively so low!! Big grin who knows Big grinLaughing out loudLaughing out loud

i am not at home to make the test again with these settings on Big grin hehe

anyway i just can say that 280 rocks like hell! Big grin

biohazard
Offline
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts:
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

Specs:

Motherboard: Foxconn Black Ops
Processor: Intel Core2Duo E8400 GHz
RAM: 2x2GB (DDR3-1333 DDR3 SDRAM)
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB)
:::Anisotropic - 16x
:::Antialiasing - 16xQ
Operating System: Windows XP Professional SP3 (32-bit)
DirectX 9

Results:
1260 Frames
1.6 Seconds
771.1 FPS

|Edit|

Specs:
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB)
:::Anisotropic - 16x
:::Antialiasing - Skull

Results:
1260 Frames
1.7 Seconds
759.4 FPS

oh and its q3 1.32

=ANU815=
outeris's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts:
LT Lithuania
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

ok i sayed, and i did, somehove i managed install graphic driver and run test inside small home pc holding place as server and router Nerd

so there they go:
hq. 36.5s - 35.4fps
low q. 24.7s - 51fps

and amazing power comes from:
debian os, intell mondecino 0.5ghz, ~390mb, Nvidia gf-100/200 2x/agp 32mb (160/180mhz)

so buy this one, main point why ?
its cheap
its consumes less power
u alaso can brake it for fun

The majority of people think they think, when really they just change their prejudices. Understanding is a matter of will in most cases.

Lietuvių excessiveplus draugija - Lithuanians National Team
Linux (1st E17+Compiz powered ! Built on Debian GNU/Linux.)

MODDB.com all cool things for Quake III Arena @ one place from E+


HELLA
Scarstruck's picture
Offline
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts:
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

My Rig

Motherboard: Rampage Extreme x48
Processor: Intel Core2Duo E8600 @3.33GHz (stock)
RAM: 4GB DDR3 (2x2GB) @ 1333MHz 9 9 9 24
Video Card: ATI HD 4870X2

ATI catalyst 9.8

Settings

Anisotropic Filtering - 16x
Anti-Aliasing - Skull
Adaptive Anti-Aliasing - Quality
Catalyst AI - Advanced
Mipmap Detail Level - High Quality
Open GL - Triple buffering

Operating System: Windows 7 Ultimate x64 RC1 Build 7100
DirectX 10

Results:
1260 Frames
1.9 Seconds
652.8 FPS

Microsoft Intellimouse Explorer 3.0 | Steelpad QCK Mass | SteelSeries Siberia V2 | 23" LG W2361V

=ANU815=
outeris's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts:
LT Lithuania
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

Hi,

So with card on this topic takes a lead, gaining more overal sumed fps'es ?

And lets see, i'm home Happy So her you go mine rezults:

1260frames.
4.0 seconds:
313.7 fps

this is max what i managed get from:
P4HT 2.5ghz, 512mb x840mhz,
NVIDIA Driver Version 173.14.09 Linux-x86, X.Org 11.0

GeForce 7600gs(128bit,agp8) 425x425mhz,

Cha cha beat me if you can Tongue
With that kind of older pc comparing to nova days rigs, it's kinda impresive fps.

The majority of people think they think, when really they just change their prejudices. Understanding is a matter of will in most cases.

Lietuvių excessiveplus draugija - Lithuanians National Team
Linux (1st E17+Compiz powered ! Built on Debian GNU/Linux.)

MODDB.com all cool things for Quake III Arena @ one place from E+


CZE|BEAZT
beazt's picture
Offline
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts:
CZ Czech Republic
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

nVidia will be always better. Not in performance but in compatibility with apps and alternative OS. ATI sux :!:

Gigabyte B450 Aorus Elite | AMD Ryzen 7 5800x (water cooled) | 32GB DDR4 3200MHz | Gigabyte Radeon Rx 6800XT | Creative Audigy RX | 500GB SSD (macOS 13) + 1TB SSD (W11P) + 3TB HDD | Apple Magic Keyboard + Logitech G603

rUnThEoN?!
Skullheadq3's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
DE Germany
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

just to show kaktus (or was it zont?) a possible score for a slow pc:

Athlon xp 1600+
256 mb ddr1 266
radeon 9200 se
winxp sp2

result: 72.6 fps.

also can reach stable 75-80 fps on dm0 at startroom and generally 100 fps on dm7 while driver is on default (driver setting matter a lot).

should be possible to get more out of that system though x) xp takes a lot fps imo.

hurrenson: "This idiot is apparently not familiar with a rail/sniper style."