User login
*SFC: .DA| 2-1 Unique // 03.07.2010
6. July 2010 - 2:34
#71
Re: [x]SFC: .DA| 2-1 Unique // 03.07.2010
Yea, maybe not for SFC, because that rule about trials is there, but all was legal to be ranked here... be man rank it!!! 
6. July 2010 - 7:52
#72
Re: [x]SFC: .DA| 2-1 Unique // 03.07.2010
roflmao, funny situation. aint the same stuff with trial member were in the match between f2b and tnt (if im right hardcore was in trial) and match was ranked. gg :D
6. July 2010 - 8:08
#73
![mow Q [EN]](/files/screenname/8646b528fbbe1090dc61e0f29405d1b3.webp "mow Q [EN]"){kind=small}
Re: [x]SFC: .DA| 2-1 Unique // 03.07.2010
http://www.excessiveplus.net/forums/thread/ranking-rules-0
Read the point about banned and trial members. It is for all visible. Trial members aren't allowed to play ranked matches.
At invisible, hardcore wasn't a trial member anymore, arghali wasn't online arround a week, and didn't make a full-member-tag for him, till than. F2B asked on server if hardcore is still trial, and whole TNT said "no".
And now a typical sentence from me: "God, so many people and no-one is able to read and comprehend".
Anyway, imo this rule must be removed, how you wanna test a member in serios situations if u can't let him play in a cw. Since i am here, trial-members always played CWs. Dunno who invented that rule.
6. July 2010 - 8:16
#74
Re: [x]SFC: .DA| 2-1 Unique // 03.07.2010
IMO the match was played and should be ranked in temprank.
6. July 2010 - 8:23
#76
Re: [x]SFC: .DA| 2-1 Unique // 03.07.2010
so, if unique told that sushi is full member, this have to be taken as fact, and match must be ranked, because than we have the same situation as F2B vs TNT /quit
6. July 2010 - 8:24
#77
Re: [x]SFC: .DA| 2-1 Unique // 03.07.2010
Impius im know the rules. Just reread what do you say about the situation with hardcore, and the upper Trickz post. ;]
6. July 2010 - 8:28
#78
Re: [x]SFC: .DA| 2-1 Unique // 03.07.2010
which has nothing to do with your post, since u are speaking explicitly about "trial members" and not about full members. but the situation explained already itself, so no need to step back, invi.
oh, and re-read my post after trickz post....
I know exaclty why i actually don't wanna post in forum anymore. What i don't know is, why i can't stop it.
6. July 2010 - 8:38
#79
Re: [x]SFC: .DA| 2-1 Unique // 03.07.2010
i meant by my post that these situations are similar with trial members between both rank matches (tnt vs f2b and unique vs da) but in the last match, where is unique leader same told that the sushi is full member, the match wasnt ranked.
ps im dont saw ur post in the time when im posted the previous one.
6. July 2010 - 9:17
#80
Re: [x]SFC: .DA| 2-1 Unique // 03.07.2010
there must be priority, who to believe to member is full of trial maybe ? clandb ? teammates ? ref?
just my opin.
Shout 11:56:50
: Hey khaz. Yop would be nice to go back into the 2006 or 2007 for example and enjoy this game with all of those great people. We had a great times.
: Hello there.
I really wish I could travel back time to play with you guys once again and strafe around ermap3, this was so chilling.
Best regards, hope you’re all doing okay.
: hi _LB I SEE THAT TOO 2 spectators all day on the Carnage Elite server weird
: Sup.
: I see 2 spectators all day on the Carnage Elite server with random names and equal ping times. What's the story on this? Anyone?
: although it’s unlikely that anyone will go there xD
: Dear FREON server administration, maybe it’s a good idea to convert the CTF server to rail duel 1v1. r4e09f.cfg?? can anyone support me? 
: Hi. Is there any way to host an excessiveplus server in South Africa. What is needed - Please let me know
: new version without Odessa https://www.exc...
: what happen with Odessa DM17 ?
Who's online
There are currently 1 user and 2 guests online.
sry for mentioning it like 5th time already on that forum... all Unique (members on server) told us that Sushi is already fullmember, but still not changed on clandb...
On board since August 2007.