[POLL] Gaming monitor 4K or 144Hz?
wrote:
wrote:
noone asked you to explain anythingufas did so go back to kitchen
![]()
you missunderstood me , let me rephrase , noone asked YOU to explain
none asked u to go out of the kitchen ![]()
again u missed the point, i asked about mouse input lag, not ghosting or screen tearing. And u mix ghosting and screen tearing all the time lolo
again u missed the point, i asked about mouse input lag, not ghosting or screen tearing. And u mix ghosting and screen tearing all the time lolo
u asked nothing, u answered ufas u dunno a fuck bout gsync n vsync, i explained about mouse input lag, ghosting, tearing and much more details related to that since ufas asked, so i replayed to both of u. im mixing nothing, suck my balls n go sleep.
gotta love e+ forums
lolo gsync vs gspot, k skull ur knowledge ends here, now we talk bout gspot, go back to gaming haha
btw hrd, would be more interesting an article on "rubber" khm...lol ![]()
seems very cool and nice, but F2 for 3 reasons : 1st 60hz ; 2nd 1500 euro only for the monitors and if u see the pc specs there for run such stuff u need other 5000 euro of pc ; 3rd 40fps average (60 is already shit...). but yea would be cool with 144hz and up to 100-120 (even just 80 would be enough) fps and i stolen money from skull's credit card, admitting he got one..![]()
Sure it looks nice but for 1497 euros, I don't think the costs outweigh the benefits.. also does anyone else think it'll be harder to game on multiple monitors? I only tried it a couple times and I didn't like it, to each their own I guess.
ps. I love how F2 has become synonymous for "disagree/dislike"
ps. I love how F2 has become synonymous for "disagree/dislike"
lol ye its damn funny how quake got inside our grammar, funny implementation ![]()







You don't think it looks nice? For only 1497€
"Skill is when luck becomes a habit".