wrote:

wrote:

What about FreeSync vs G-Sync? http://www.pcworld.com/article/2897623/hands-on-with-amds-freesync-the-technology-that-could-kill-nvidias-g-sync.html

If both create same mouse input lag as vsync they are a no go.

Using my asus with a cheap DP cable now, works good.

absolutely not, they`re both good and got very low input lag for mouse. there are 2 differences between them, for gsync u need peripherals with nvidia integrated gsync hw, with freesync u can use it wherever without limitations. the other thing with free sync is that u can also uncap vsync for get more fps but u`ll get again input lag and it`s a useless option anyway. personally i`d go for amd freesync since its open and free, instead of using gsync and being constricted to have nvidia-friendly peripherals.

thank you for stating something i already know.

noone asked you to explain anything

Return ur Dr. degree Diablo.
The reason why I am a good Gamer is because I mostly know the stuff I am talking about - YOU DON'T.
I don't care weither it is plain stupidy, lack of mathematically intelligence or just simply not being interested in the details.

wrote:

1st is relative to the ghosting

There is no Sync technology that fixes ghosting. Ghosting is when ur lcd is so slow that u see the old image while the new one is displayed. Therefor Gamers go with Screens with a lot of HZ and small color change times. - My Asus does both, I have nearly zero ghosting compared to a crt.
This is Ghosting -> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5b/TV_ghosting_interference.jpg
This is Screen tearing -> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/03/Tearing_%28simulated%29.jpg/797px-Tearing_%28simulated%29.jpg
The last one is the effect you want to avoid by syncing the rendering device with the displaying device.
For details of all 3 technologys:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vsync#Vertical_synchronization
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-Sync
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FreeSync
There are posts of HQ testing Vsync and forcing his screen to run 125hz for example.
The problem I am talking about is this1:
http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2606502
http://www.overclock.net/t/1246149/bf3-possible-vsync-trick-no-input-lag-frame-sync-no-tearing
The problem with Gsync and Freesync seems to be the same Program logic.
http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/forum/threadview/2955064788223834784/2/

Read stuff up urself, but it seems Gamers will keep playing with sync turned off so every part of the computer runs at its max.

wrote:

im stupid

hmm seems lately u more idiot than usual, all what u wrote in this last post, i know EVERYTHING related to it already,dont even know why u tried to explain me...u try to explain ME what is ghosting and tearing? i dont even know why u wasted ur time asnwering me, it was pretty obvious u didnt know a fuck about gsync and freesync, u wrote it CLEARLY, then when i post my knowledge u come out that u know everyhing, and now for show me that u know, u gone read on wikipedia n posted me links thinkin ur the man. plus u sending me posts of 2012 related to vsync, totally useless, we all know vsync sux balls, BUT now with gsync and freesync seems its pretty much better. ghosting i know exactly as u say that its coz of slow monitor response...i see it everyday on my fuckin lcd/tv of shit on my pc...still seems that with gsync ghosting is reduced due to ADDITIONAL NVIDIA HARDWARE INTEGRATED IN THE MONITOR COZ OF GSYNC TECHNOLOGY. with this last answer u trolled urself 2time with ur own hands, u should read ur signature more often, less arrogance would be damn healty little "good gamer", since when u are a good gamer? coz on e+ u can make some frags? lol anyway, i forget to say that freesync and gsync doesnt limit u to 60hz but till 144 n more, i just rememberd that i didnt mention this before.