wrote:

Most of the titles are jokes in context, so let's not take them so serious.

As for Equis suggestion, i don't get it. You guys want an "Uncensored, nearly unmoderated Off-topic" sub-forum?

Problem is exactly this u wont take so serius the others word but want the ppl take ur works seriusly.

if u want to make a joke in a serius rule i dont get the point. but if u are agree about this jokes or with the ironic content in ur last answer on trashed stuff why dont u leave that the owner of the trashed make the jokes? same guy, how this can look? lets see an example:
1.- "hi guys, i'm an angry kid" can look like:
2.- "hi guys, i'm an temper mod, pissing in ur words"

If this rule is to avoid flames and troubles u must be the first who take this serius and dont make personal jokes or comments. independently if the guy u like it or not.

About Equi suggestion: we can have 2 steps before final lock. its like a warning, because maybe post where out of context or in bad treath, forum, etc. but this dont means that all the letters wroten in it are full crap.
so trashing in the first step u can understand that somthing was wrong and ur post is close to be locked. maybe not in all cases but i think this rule need some retouch. to make it works fine for all around not only for someones.

Well i have to finish some work now so i dont have extra braint to think in the way that this can works better to stop having troubles with mods and ppl. maybe later or in the week.

Greetings

lol

smo make warner-brothers gen-mod. I will vote F1 for sure. (no joke, i want to have back the good mooded mad, and not this stressed, bad-mooded mod-mad).

Majority is not feeling fine with current situation? Please explain this closer "RENATALIS", some arguments, some examples. You claim always stuff without fundamental arguments and sources (like in primary school)

Personal Note: Renatalis, pls explain me, are u able to understand the thinkings of the nowadays youth? (Past posts really shows the opposite).

If you have a problem with a mod, gather your facts and take it with budman (budman's words) - ffs??

I feel that this modding system works fine. So far the only fact that was mentioned, is the jokes on trashed threads/posts. Looking at this in a totally neutral way, i can see how this can be "annoying", so now this issue is adressed the mods might stop it.

wrote:

ppl started to get into dyscusions about persons not about belives and this makes a lot of shit in not so long past, the advice of day is to focus only about maters

*===*Let us count how many times rena will say the exact same thing, after hq's post. (2 so far)

wrote:

equi, is it democratic to insult? at least in germany it is against human rights.

Insulting is for me not that people to heated discussions.

(like it is for rena; smo: "hi rena, ur oppinion is really strange", rena: "bah, who are you to attack me, i was a platoonleader, so, wtf are u doing?" (attention!: This example is exaggerated))

Insulting is for me, hurting people with personal attacks. Smo people dont care about such attacks, others take it serios, and it is not up to the attacker, if it is hurting, or if the attacked dotn care. The victim makes the final decission.

And insulting is like i said, against the human rights, at least in germany. If people cant discuss without insulting, they can go to hell, they have nothing to search in a community.

And in this relation, it think mods make a great job with moving threads and lock it. Also renas posts, which are lately really insultiv, also mine posts, also everyones posts, which became insultiv.

The victims have to be protected, and not the wannabe extraordanerys. (If it is about human rights, human rights > freedom of speech)

In Germany it's illegal to deny the Holocaust. Get a grip, naturally it's democratic to insult someone. Infact, it's the definiton of democracy and freedom of speech to insult someone. The right to insult someone is always more important than the right not-to be insulted.

Nevertheless, this is a private forum and points about freedom of speech and democracy, or the superiority of communism (the death) are completely out of context here.

@mirc
The holocaust? I have nothing to do with the holocaust. It is not my failure in anyway, so i dont have any responsiblity on that.

You all not-germans, get a grip about that the current germans have nothing to do what happened more then 50 years ago. Therefore, please stop at last with your idiotic reproaches from the past, as we would still be responsible for what happened in past.

And most germans detest too most deeply what happened in past. The holocaust nowadays is a memorial, so that the crimes of the former time do not get into oblivion. More is it not for me, a memorial.

And who denies the holocaust has a crack in the bowl, or has to get something good out of the former time. At least despises this person people's of a certain source.

And in any case, nazis exist in every country in a form, that is already sad enough. therefore sweep around at your own house door.

Btw. Mircwar; Sweden ratified on 4th February 1952 the European Human-Rights-Convention, so, in this case, there is no difference about the case "insulting" between germany and sweden.

Everybody has a right to intellectual and physical integrity. Also has everybody the right of freedom of speech. Both rights are part of human rights, so, if those rights are going into conflict with each other, the right of integrity is higher. At least my personal oppinion, depends, on what the other has done to you.

@rena
And Rena, it are not my posts which mislead continually to battles of words, just look at your threats of the closer past.

Wasn't it you who said, "nobody can change my oppinion". So, who is the guy, who can't discuss, who insulted the most of all of this community?