:: Feedback on Pro.cfg ::

29 replies [Last post]
23. March 2008 - 13:02
#21
bert
Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts:
:: Feedback on Pro.cfg ::

its still a noob cfg, you have no right to call it pro.
you have to remove bfg and multijumps at least.
diss.cfg is more appropriate.

Top
23. March 2008 - 13:28
#22
+l#+l#+z#+z#+u#+u#+p#+p#
moonshield's picture
Offline
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts:
:: Feedback on Pro.cfg ::
bert wrote:

its still a noob cfg, you have no right to call it pro.
you have to remove bfg and multijumps at least.
diss.cfg is more appropriate.

If he was the first one who released a config called "pro" he has the right to call it pro even if it wasn't such a "pro" config. Confused

Excessive Plus Configuration Files

Top
24. March 2008 - 1:08
#23
NINE
NiNe's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts:
:: Feedback on Pro.cfg ::

What ever happened to constructive criticism? Shock

....you never know when it's your time to go.

Top
24. March 2008 - 11:37
#24
+l#+l#+z#+z#+u#+u#+p#+p#
moonshield's picture
Offline
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts:
:: Feedback on Pro.cfg ::
NINE wrote:

What ever happened to constructive criticism? Shock

x2

Excessive Plus Configuration Files

Top
24. March 2008 - 11:46
#25
mow Q [EN]
Offline
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts:
:: Feedback on Pro.cfg ::
+l#+l#+z#+z#+u#+u#+p#+p# wrote:

bert wrote:
its still a noob cfg, you have no right to call it pro.
you have to remove bfg and multijumps at least.
diss.cfg is more appropriate.

If he was the first one who released a config called "pro" he has the right to call it pro even if it wasn't such a "pro" config. Confused

Ye, the right to deceive others Happy, pretty used in advertising.

Sry for offtopic...

Top
24. March 2008 - 19:29
#26
UnknownUser807
Reno's picture
Offline
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts:
:: Feedback on Pro.cfg ::

not a bad conf.

"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." - Benjamin Franklin

Top
25. March 2008 - 0:57
#27
+l#+l#+z#+z#+u#+u#+p#+p#
moonshield's picture
Offline
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts:
:: Feedback on Pro.cfg ::
mow Q [EN] wrote:

Ye, the right to deceive others Happy, pretty used in advertising.

Sry for offtopic...

plus.cfg... why not this then? The mod is Excessive Plus so the config name gives an illusion that plus.cfg was somehow a part of the original mod.

EDIT: \o

Excessive Plus Configuration Files

Top
25. March 2008 - 2:12
#28
rUnThEoN?!
Skullheadq3's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
DE Germany
:: Feedback on Pro.cfg ::
+l#+l#+z#+z#+u#+u#+p#+p# wrote:


plus.cfg... why not this then? The mod is Excessive Plus so the config name gives an illusion that plus.cfg was somehow a part of the original mod.

the name plus is used with the agreement of easy as far as i know, plus was created as mulle flamed mow & co for using an edited bro.cfg with naming it bro-editedswitchwhateveridontknowanymore.cfg so they renamed it.
plus.cfg is the name for the cfg that is mostly played atm, since people can suggest things and oppinions of most players are well known sometimes.
so it represent the biggest side of e+ mode and has imo the right to be called plus.cfg
edit: sry for being tired and making one crap english sentence after another.

hurrenson: "This idiot is apparently not familiar with a rail/sniper style."

Top
25. March 2008 - 6:55
#29
+l#+l#+z#+z#+u#+u#+p#+p#
moonshield's picture
Offline
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts:
:: Feedback on Pro.cfg ::

Yeah point was if he has plus.cfg this dude has every right to have pro.cfg. As long as the names aren't copied from each other it's just fine.

Excessive Plus Configuration Files

Top