Which card?

16 replies [Last post]
auth
Offline
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts:
SB EMU10K1
55% (6 votes)
Intel 82801G
45% (5 votes)
Total votes: 11

CZE|BEAZT
beazt's picture
Offline
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts:
CZ Czech Republic
Which card?

everything integrated is shit. Mainly Intel devices Big grin I have many years old Creative soundblaster and its rox!!! Everyone who tell you that integrated sound devices with 7.1 output are good never heard that difference and excelent sound by creative soundcard

Gigabyte B450 Aorus Elite | AMD Ryzen 7 5800x (water cooled) | 32GB DDR4 3200MHz | Gigabyte Radeon Rx 6800XT | Creative Audigy RX | 500GB SSD (macOS 13) + 1TB SSD (W11P) + 3TB HDD | Apple Magic Keyboard + Logitech G603

auth
Offline
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts:
Which card?
CZE|BEAZT wrote:

everything integrated is shit. Mainly Intel devices Big grin I have many years old Creative soundblaster and its rox!!! Everyone who tell you that integrated sound devices with 7.1 output are good never heard that difference and excelent sound by creative soundcard

Heh, as I've been going deep with this dilema most friends said same!!

But does this mean anythin?

About Intel HD:
Hardware based on Intel HD Audio specifications is capable of
delivering 192 kHz/32 bit quality for two and 96 kHz/32 bit for up to eight channels.

About SB EMU10K1:
Musicians, content developers and others .. voiced their disappointment at the loss of resolution and sound detail when converting to 48kHz for internal processing.
(Of course this is the only negative thing I've read about emu10k1, and other of it specs are quite impressive)

CZE|BEAZT
beazt's picture
Offline
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts:
CZ Czech Republic
Which card?

my experience with specifications of integrated sound devices is, that specificated values are only on paper. My "great" integrated soundcard is specificated better than my old soundblaster but in real if you will play some song in winamp and use headphones, soundblaster makes 5x better sound. I never heard sound from integrated soundcard that can be compared with creative soundcard

Gigabyte B450 Aorus Elite | AMD Ryzen 7 5800x (water cooled) | 32GB DDR4 3200MHz | Gigabyte Radeon Rx 6800XT | Creative Audigy RX | 500GB SSD (macOS 13) + 1TB SSD (W11P) + 3TB HDD | Apple Magic Keyboard + Logitech G603

UnknownUser807
Reno's picture
Offline
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts:
Which card?

"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." - Benjamin Franklin

orphy with the wind
Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts:
Which card?

Plus it's cheap, oh, I'll get two and make myself a dual setup tonight Big grin, I'll be getting 95465 sps (sounds per second) hahe Winking

CZE|BEAZT
beazt's picture
Offline
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts:
CZ Czech Republic
Which card?

m-audio? Isnt if something like "made if vietnam" ? My opinion: creative rox! SoundBlaster is the best choice for gamers -> maximal compatibility, excelent sound quality :!:

Gigabyte B450 Aorus Elite | AMD Ryzen 7 5800x (water cooled) | 32GB DDR4 3200MHz | Gigabyte Radeon Rx 6800XT | Creative Audigy RX | 500GB SSD (macOS 13) + 1TB SSD (W11P) + 3TB HDD | Apple Magic Keyboard + Logitech G603

UnknownUser807
Reno's picture
Offline
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts:
Which card?

its made for music production, but for sound quality it makes soundblaster look like a mickey mouse soundcard imo

"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." - Benjamin Franklin

ghost
Offline
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts:
Which card?
CZE|BEAZT wrote:

m-audio? Isnt if something like "made if vietnam" ? My opinion: creative rox! SoundBlaster is the best choice for gamers -> maximal compatibility, excelent sound quality :!:

u r prety wrong man, m-audio is a profesional sound source, they making devices for recording studios. Sound blaster carts were always low segment products creative have deferent line of producs high segment that are called EMU

http://www.m-audio.com/index.php?do=products.family

http://www.emu.com/products/ (meybe its hard to belive but is the same company as making sound blaster) well they discowered ppl gaming on thier presious machines dont relay care so much about sound quality, and thier strategy maked them fload whole market by low segment devices named SoundBlaster

--------------------------------------------

about a choice u asked here m8, well is not so obvious choice as some might sugested, filtering will be beter on SB and propably on yors itegrated ss. u will have more details but also not fully clear sound

i am using audigy 2 and i am not satysfied in some maters if comes to sound, yeah sound is good but on beter ss. iven some integrated i heard prety much more details

if u rely care about sound u can try out m-audio, emu, terratec, audiotrack, esi

well meybe look at:

if u want surround sound check out prodigy 7.1LT or maya 7.1 from audiotrack

or esi juli@

meybe esi maya44 ? its not suround ss enyway Happy well i do pie on suround Smug

kep in mind i am use beyerdynamic 770 PRO on mine pc not eny cheap surround speakers or pc headphones

EVOL.WAX
Forum moderator
WAX's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts:
Which card?

yep have to agree EMU soundcards rock... Happy

@psultan onboard always sounds thin and nasty no mater how they dress it up. so just to agree with all here, use the soundblaster, infact any soundblaster for that matter:)..or did beast already say that Happy

NecrogeddoN
necrogeddon's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts:
Which card?

Onboard sucks. I've been using SB Live Platinum 5.1 forever now, there's no going back (especially since I'm in music composition/production anyway)...

but I'm stuck with onboard graphics still. Big sad face for onboard anything. Crying

  • NVidia GeForce 8400GS

  • Logitech MX510

  • Hyperglide Teflon Skates

  • Steelpad QcK+

  • iHome IH-K200MB

  • SB Live! 5.1 Platinum

  • Logitech Precision Gaming Headphones

  • Insignia 32" HDTV