User login
Theoretical contention:
3. May 2007 - 12:31
![mow Q [EN]](/files/screenname/8646b528fbbe1090dc61e0f29405d1b3.webp "mow Q [EN]"){kind=small}
TD, GBS, BAC, CF, UO, FC, YETOW, EXE, ST etc.
From where do all these clans come?
I mean, indeed, i am not as active as formerly, however nevertheless many clans are popping up this days and i know none of the people of them.
Just a theoretical contention:
I let play old members of 2!S against new members. After that i post the war in Ranking as 2!S against 2Y. And if anyone wanna play against 2Y i just say, 2Y died meanwhile.
Sure, this is just a wild, theoretical claim. But can we be sure, that something like this does not happen? Also, whats up, if some are double- or tripple-claning just for fun?
Don't get me wrong, i am glad about every new clan and call also all new clans welcome.
I would like to hear only your opinions and impressions because finally the world does not turn around 2!S-Freeze, where i mostly play, if i play, so i dont have a look in all busy servers.
3. May 2007 - 12:36
#1
Theoretical contention:
Hm.
BAC, CF, UO, FC and ST i know. I oftenly (when i do actually play) bump into people from these clans, and i would go as far as call them legit. Dunno about the others...
Yes, i am starting to get worried about what you wrote myself, Mow. I remember Tar suggesting a simple yet effective way to filter out non-serious clans from the ranking, during the whole "4v4 min" mishap.
And not much can be done about sneaky multiclanners, really. Only that they'll get uncovered sooner or later.
3. May 2007 - 13:36
#2
Theoretical contention:
Interesting.... 
You all will understand soon what I was ment and was try to do....
3. May 2007 - 14:00
#4
Theoretical contention:
Eh, let's not go down there again...
-
On topic, I can see how this might lead to a problematic situation. Not so much about multiclanning, since the level of most of those players isn't that great, but about filling the rank with 20 clans that might die (or seem dead). There are solutions and some of them were mentioned in the other thread.
I guess you mean that multiclanning can be a problem if 'good' players do it. About those not so skilled...who cares anyway? ;d And yes, as mad said, they'll be revealed sooner or later.
3. May 2007 - 14:30
#5
Theoretical contention:
Well i was preparing one big discussion about new ranking rules and points, wich should help clean the situation significantly. I was delayed by the exam i had today (wich i passed weeee 
) so i might as well start the discussion now.
3. May 2007 - 14:58
#6
Theoretical contention:
dunno about others, but i heard yetow isnt clan its team, dunno its true or not
(\__/)
(+'.'+)
(")_(")
This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny to your signature help him gain world domination.
All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.. [G.Orwell]
3. May 2007 - 15:12
#7
Theoretical contention:
wrote:further rena, please post just if u have something to say "ontopic". We dont speak here about 4v4 rules or similiar!
I will post when ever I want and what ever I want 
It is about freedom of speech. 
And I also can make line here that my post wasn't off topic, I think that is just opposite Anyway, anyhow I respect your opinion Mowq Also I respect you as personality Stay cool, smile 
Cheers
3. May 2007 - 15:19
#8
Re: Theoretical contention:
wrote:TD, GBS, BAC, CF, UO, FC, YETOW, EXE, ST etc
Its so easy to add a clan to the database so im not very suprised. But how can anyone control it
3. May 2007 - 16:38
#9
Re: Theoretical contention:
wrote:TD, GBS, BAC, CF, UO, FC, YETOW, EXE, ST etcIts so easy to add a clan to the database so im not very suprised. But how can anyone control it
We could control it (by accepting a clan or not)
if most well known clans don't play with a new clan cw, that means we don't accept.
but how to determine if a clan should be accepted or not ?
or do u prefer a commity that analyse clans ? there are some ppl that would enjoy this job 
( to know who is who )
... anyway, for multiclaning, it could be resolved by only one way that I have proposed long time ago 
a centralized registration of players in e+, and a clan management web program with some rules like (join one clan only in the same conf or not, join as many teams as u like, be part of national team or not ...).
hehe, but this was said as e+ team has planned it for the FUTUR WEBSITE (that will be out in 2020) :roll:
Wanna avoid seeying mow, skull & co 
Check this peacefull place
3. May 2007 - 18:23
#10
Theoretical contention:
Well having to give out a forum profile number for each and every player in the clan entry would be a good start but then you'd probably need a different category for teams and for national teams, pretty much like in the forums...
Still I suppose it's easy to get two accounts here
Shout 17:20:48
: Fofo gtfo
: Hello :]
: try my gaming group https://discord...
: Khaz, I smell alcohol-induced nostalgia here!
: This game was so great, till today there’s no game that is better. Cant forget all the years playing this.
: Hey khaz. Yop would be nice to go back into the 2006 or 2007 for example and enjoy this game with all of those great people. We had a great times.
: Hello there.
I really wish I could travel back time to play with you guys once again and strafe around ermap3, this was so chilling.
Best regards, hope you’re all doing okay.
: hi _LB I SEE THAT TOO 2 spectators all day on the Carnage Elite server weird
: Sup.
: I see 2 spectators all day on the Carnage Elite server with random names and equal ping times. What's the story on this? Anyone?
Who's online
There are currently 2 users and 22 guests online.
Nope, because 4v4 rule sucks. Just look the war 2!S vs Deva, where on lost connection and we finished the 4v4 than 3v3. I have no time to repeat every second war on a other date.
further rena, please post just if u have something to say "ontopic". We dont speak here about 4v4 rules or similiar!