Severity and Persistense

43 replies [Last post]

2. January 2011 - 22:55

Offline

Joined: Mar 2008

Posts:

So, what did we eventually get? Let's take a look in this shit. This treatment is directed to Skull personally.The community allready noticed you, that you should announce the new edited rules. But you didnt get it.

This s looking nice.

As epsilon mentioned in clan war thread -

wrote:

its kinda unfair skull because ebashu had redcard yes but till now
Red card was the last warning, meaning not banned.

Quote:

* RED CARD

Last warning before a ban.

but after the rules were changed ... (yesterday 2.01.2011 0:09) it states :

Quote:

* RED CARD

2 yellow cards = red, means banned.

______
epsislow

The first thing is that you didnt annouce it to us, but this isnt the worst thing that you ve done.

You can't apply a new rule that hards a penalty to thoose people who ve allready done so.

How about to apply one more stupid rule that tells for example " cl_maxpackets allowed only up to 20" and ban all players who ve allready used this command.

What a fking bullshit are you telling us. Im using now picmip 4. Would you say me tomorow that its allowed only up to a 3 and ban me maybe next day, while I didnt know a shit about it?

Im repeating you again, YOU CANT APPLY SUCH THINGS FOR "CRIMES" THAT VE BEEN ALLREADY DONE.

If you want to add such rules - you have to announce us first and apply it to a players that WILL do this "crime". And in current example its obtain RED CARD.

I dont know who were telling u theese shitideas, maybe my 24/7 online friend.

Ebashu will not be kicked from clan because of ur retardness and will continue play at cws.

2. January 2011 - 23:21

Offline

Joined: Dec 2005

Posts:

Germany

Re: Severity and Persistense / or How it should look like?

short reminder, there is no power in this site allowing me to punish you with a rule invented after an issue. thats how everything always been treaten here and always should be treaten here, on another note, im open for discussion but im short of time for now, will get back later tonight.

hurrenson: "This idiot is apparently not familiar with a rail/sniper style."

2. January 2011 - 23:28

Offline

Joined: Nov 2003

Posts:

Re: Severity and Persistense / or How it should look like?

Quote:

This treatment is directed to Skull personally.

If u r so obsessed by the rules than follow them and make a PM to Skull instead of generating public attention? Follow your own words please

2. January 2011 - 23:40

Offline

Joined: Mar 2008

Posts:

Re: Severity and Persistense / or How it should look like?

wrote:

there is no power in this site allowing me to punish you with a rule invented after an issue.

So where is missunderstanding? The rule that RED CARD is equal BAN were impletmented after TGK got a RED CARD. So how the fuck should he be banned now?
EDIT:

wrote:

This treatment is directed to Skull personally.

If u r so obsessed by the rules than follow them and make a PM to Skull instead of generating public attention? Follow your own words please

Oh, my 24/7 online friend, please dont try to show self like a well-educated man, even you should understand that words were adressed personaly to Skull and the problem were adressed to public.
EDIT 2:

My dear 24/7/8 years online friend, if you have nothing to say on the subject, please go to the next topic, reach there yours 10000 post and turn another one thread into spam topic, you cant make this one, caz Ill reply you in this post only.
EDIT 3:
I found better decidion, I just moved this thread and Ill delete all ur spaming posts, because I want to see here answers directed only to a subject of this topic. Thx

3. January 2011 - 16:56

Offline

Joined: Nov 2003

Posts:

Re: Severity and Persistense / or How it should look like?

spam. deleted by FPS. (rulequotes = spam)

3. January 2011 - 14:03

Offline

Joined: Nov 2003

Posts:

Re: Severity and Persistense / or How it should look like?

wrote:

spam. deleted.

Edit by FPS:

This time I will answer clearly to you.If you are trying to provoke me and start new flame war - its ok, but you wont be able to do it in this thread. This thread was made public and I count the subject as a problem.

And I want and I WILL accept EVERY bad or good comment about THE SUBJECT here.

But I will not accept comments from you about our relationships based on personal negativity. Thx.

Btw. I agree with you, that i am an idiot.

2. January 2011 - 23:59

Offline

Joined: Jul 2008

Posts:

Re: Severity and Persistense / or How it should look like?

wrote:

Quote:
This treatment is directed to Skull personally.

If u r so obsessed by the rules than follow them and make a PM to Skull instead of generating public attention? Follow your own words please

King of Riposte ! Admin Ban Me Plz coz some1 make me laugh

3. January 2011 - 4:52

Offline

Joined: Dec 2005

Posts:

Germany

Re: Severity and Persistense / or How it should look like?

Just for further information, I was the one who handed out the ebashu ban and I also judged the red card back in past, I also introduced the card system if I remember right.

So in fact, terror made a mistake which gave ebashu the possibility to play.

hurrenson: "This idiot is apparently not familiar with a rail/sniper style."

3. January 2011 - 11:51

Offline

Joined: Mar 2008

Posts:

Re: Severity and Persistense / or How it should look like?

The old warning system was looking like.

1st warning - last warning - ban

Ebashu made an issue and he has recieved last warning for it.

The old rules were written clearly and understandably, and we arent very intersted that someone had meant while was making them.

And I think that Terror understood the rules at a time when he punished Ebashu. If he would like to ban him, he would give him a BAN, but he gave him a red card ( the last warning before ban ).

According to the new rules - 1st warning became into last warning. So, we should replace an old RED CARD with YELLOW card, because now we have only one CARD and it means last warning.

3. January 2011 - 14:02

Offline

Joined: Nov 2003

Posts:

Re: Severity and Persistense / or How it should look like?

Well, FPS is right, considering how it was written before you updated it. And if it is true that the red card was before the update of the rules, than the ban should be rejected.

Nevertheless, in future, to keep it logical, red card = ban (referring to soccer).

yellow card = warning

2nd yellow card = yellow/red = ban (soft ban)

Direct red card = ban (hard ban)

3. January 2011 - 13:52

#10

Offline

Joined: Mar 2008

Posts:

Re: Severity and Persistense / or How it should look like?

wrote:

Well, FPS is right

Ebashu, please, leave Impius alone, dont threat him with a knife at the throat and dont force him to write posts with agreement with me

Well, serious, even if Impius has agreed with such ignorant fuckface like me, that could mean only that Im realy right. So, skull, please, put ur pride smwehere out and agree that you were wrong in this case. He had the last warning - red card, now the last warning is the yellow card, so just replace it with the yellow and make this end.

Shout 08:47:56

CZE|BEAZT : Hey khaz. Yop would be nice to go back into the 2006 or 2007 for example and enjoy this game with all of those great people. We had a great times.