No more inactive teams. New team rules vote.

34 replies [Last post]
plastrom
Offline
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts:
DE Germany
Re: No more inactive teams. New team rules vote.

bad idea. it's useless on the one hand (except for keeping two guys from creating tags) and doing no good on the other - i wouldnt vote for removal of RATW, XxX or BORG forums and clandb entry, which you'd 'hit' aswell.

same reasoning could be used for clans aswell: all but two clans wouldve received ban during summer.

...
heardrak's picture
Offline
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts:
Re: No more inactive teams. New team rules vote.

F1

KERSY
kersye's picture
Offline
Joined: May 2010
Posts:
DE Germany
Re: No more inactive teams. New team rules vote.
plastrom wrote:

bad idea. it's useless on the one hand (except for keeping two guys from creating tags) and doing no good on the other - i wouldnt vote for removal of RATW, XxX or BORG forums and clandb entry, which you'd 'hit' aswell.

same reasoning could be used for clans aswell: all but two clans wouldve received ban during summer.

I agree with you. Borg is not playing fun wars anymore but nevertheless we are all in contact - in my opionion if you delete the old teams from Clan DB it s next step to death of this community

and between : Same for Mr

cheat.exe
klash's picture
Offline
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts:
Re: No more inactive teams. New team rules vote.
plastrom wrote:

bad idea. it's useless on the one hand (except for keeping two guys from creating tags) and doing no good on the other - i wouldnt vote for removal of RATW, XxX or BORG forums and clandb entry, which you'd 'hit' aswell.

same reasoning could be used for clans aswell: all but two clans wouldve received ban during summer.

agree with him, don't touch my Ratws

oldskool'shox
Offline
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts:
DE Germany
Re: No more inactive teams. New team rules vote.

First of all i'm doubting that you can prevent a group of friends from founding a team/clan. I think most of the Borg members won't simply stop being Borg members, just because Borg didn't play any mentionable wars in the past 2 years. So even if Borg was deleted, we could still gather and show up with a lineup at any given point, wearing the same tag and play as Borg. I see no way how you could prevent that. On the other hand, i agree that there shouldn't be dozens of fun teams, created by the same guy in the same week. Every player should be allowed to be a member of only one clan and only one fun team -regardless of the position in those clans/teams. Therefore they would have to do leave their current clan / team, if they decided to found/join another. (I'm pretty sure that these were the old rules... what happened to them anyway!?) Don't touch the old clans, just because they are not appealing to the esthetics of this website in your eyes.

Johnin*ELITE'Z*
Hatake Kakashi Johnin's picture
Offline
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts:
Re: No more inactive teams. New team rules vote.
khaz' wrote:

1) Every team has to play at least 1 FunWar a month. If the
team won't play at least one game a month the team
receives yellow clandb card.
3 yellow cards - team blocked and deleted.

Cheers!

Zeig Hail.

"...War brings death... and wounds and pain to both sides... there's nothing harder to accept than the deaths of those you love... so you believe... they could never die... especially those who haven't known war... you try to find meaning in death... but... there's only pain... and hatred... that you don't know what to do with...dying like trash... neverending hatred... pain that never heals... that.. is war..." N.

burP
Offline
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts:
Re: No more inactive teams. New team rules vote.

I see some old teams/clans like ELITE, BORG and RATW which are not active. However they are still more alive as any other team/clan. They represent and are associated with servers or configs. Like ELITE represents the ELITE rail servers, RATW represents the rail CTF config (and RUS CTF server), BORG represents e5r config (and ofcourse the Borg servers) Borg has also much involvement in BEER server. So playing (fun)wars or not... these teams are more active as any other clan playing wars every week.
Without these teams the status of the servers or configs will decrease and will probably lead to death of the community (of what is still left)
If u want to have some order, start to make same configs on different servers instead of all different configs on every server. There are different communities in one community now... and therefor there are so many teams/clans.

And if u want to keep focussing and banning teams/clans.... just ban GoGi of making them... problem solved Winking i think u can delete at least half the clandb by deleting clans/teams where GoGi is a (vice)leader

Also a limit per player is nice to start: one clan and max 2 teams for example... but then all those different configs makes it hard to manage because u cant compare Borg team to ?Dunn0? team for example

PS: Mutlijump and fastswitch are totally shit and decreases the need of skill At wits'' end

!@#$%&*( terror )_
terror's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts:
GB United Kingdom
Re: No more inactive teams. New team rules vote.

1 clan rule is good but 1 team rule is stupid. Atleast 3 teams per player. Go ask spider to add it for you and end of problem

BOZO
Bozo's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts:
Re: No more inactive teams. New team rules vote.

This is surely the best way to sound the death bell for E+. You can't force people to play FWs. This isn't the Olympics. People are here to play for fun. If clans/teams are forced to play FWs the fun will be gone faster than one can say "Oh snap".

rUnThEoN?!
Skullheadq3's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
DE Germany
Re: No more inactive teams. New team rules vote.

oh snap

Less arrogance would be healthy