- xp_enemyHeadModel does not work
- Q3DM3D Duke3d map for Q3
- General POLSKI Topic
- Help me with selection Defrag maps
- 5let hogy legyen valami mozgás...
- what server Berlin Underground 2006 name meaning ?
- Hyperactivity from Quake3
- RailOnly cfg
- 24/7 Quake 3 server , cheap cost
- Server stats failing, player names not shown
Loosingpackets
Maximal of loosingpackets 0-5% is ok. ![]()
IMO up to 10 % is acceptable.
Maximal of loosingpackets 0-5% is ok. ![]()
I think it would be unfair to stop people playing in CW if they have bad ping, not everyone can afford good connection. If a player can still get some good shots in with packet loss, then that is good training for them.
Next there will be a Poll to say, do you think players with bad Graphics cards should play in CW?
Regards
IMO up to 10 % is acceptable.
I agree with you, Rena. Up to 10% is is acceptable.
than serlant never will be able to play a war again, because he has default 15-25 % lost.
Bit thx!
than serlant never will be able to play a war again, because he has default 15-25 % lost.
Big thx!
(this is close to racism)
I don't know how good or bad the ping loss works in the score board. I've seen people with 15 % packet loss run smoothly and others with 2 % have slideshow performance. I might be missing info on how data travel for q3 though.
--edit--
The way i see it, if he is hittable he can play ![]()
than serlant never will be able to play a war again, because he has default 15-25 % lost.
Bit thx!
not only he will cant play no more ![]()






if you vote for ppl can play with loosingpackets, write a reason too,
also i votet for 0-5%
more than 5% start to be hard for fraging
http://i.minus.com/ibr3JCojpWyue4.gif
Kai Greene: " Oouuuhh "