User login
-ED- 3:0 HTK/18.02.07
2. March 2007 - 20:59
#101
® -ED- 3:0 HTK/18.02.07
Big deal.
They both sux 
They have to play one CW on E5 cfg. Then same CW with same maps on E6 cfg. And then we will see which clan is better on which cfg. It is so immature don't play because know that you lose ?! What ? You will play only when you know that you will win ? 
It is like JUVENTUS will never play against MILAN What is point when you know that you are better and win ? Where is joy ? Best CWs in BRO decided by single kill... Lemon vs SWE, KO vs Lemon etc. etc...
2. March 2007 - 22:02
#102
® -ED- 3:0 HTK/18.02.07
For me this is the end of discussion..i could answer to u bodz but would be waste of time..i really dont give a fuck about ed..and its clearly well know whos better clan..so i dont care if we play or not and i really dont care if an outsider like rena come here and trying act as he know anything..fuck it really..its boring...but im fed up with this...really..so pls try finally a fuckin date, cfg whatever u want and play this shit finally..and i dont give a fuck what bro side thinking bodz..ff wont be on for sure..if u want it so much then i dont think so we will play...let the bro side enjoy ff.
anyway sry for some hard word..im just bored from this..
2. March 2007 - 22:13
#103
![S3c|¯3¯|¯ [EN]](/files/screenname/fb48bf71f868792b4724881a0b7912c5.webp "S3c|¯3¯|¯ [EN]"){kind=small}
® -ED- 3:0 HTK/18.02.07
wrote:
- EN play E5 with all other clans beside ED
- ED don't wanna play against EN on E6
point one is not valid...
first the fact that our last e5 only matches were all setted up before e6 was released...
and if you read my offer it consists playing 2 maps on the cfg ED prefers - e5...
that means we also play e5 with ED...
like Kati said... give every clan its cfg... thats the fairest way 
we just dont see any reason to play all maps on the cfg they want just because they try again to make the match failing...
but hey... now everyone knows why ED doesnt get any fight against better clans... their conditions or none... thats not acceptable for a lot of clans 
but just for bodz... you want a standard cfg being used on official servers?
so ok all 3 maps on Excessive3.cfg!?
hits all your critirons
as for ff...
as already said... never was and for sure never will be a standard for e5 side...
points against it? already said some... but here again for bodz:
- main movement in e5 and similiar cfgs is by weapons... ergo moving = hurting your team8s...
- e5 and similiar cfgs do not have pointing weapons... so if a teamm8 and an enemy are standing close to each other you just can hit both...
k boy... now stop searching excuses... the offer I made is more than fair for you guys...
and as said... for that great offer from our side we expect you to accept your loss in the last match... else fighting again wont make any sense to us... if you just accept the matches you win 
but yea we know... you guys just talk and dont want that match...
2. March 2007 - 22:37
#104
Belgium
® -ED- 3:0 HTK/18.02.07
rena you dont have to decide who will play with who and whiche gametype
and stop delete my posts
thx.
>>PURE E5 WHORE<<
2. March 2007 - 23:15
#105
® -ED- 3:0 HTK/18.02.07
wrote:and stop delete my posts
thx.
hahaha! n1
btw. Rena... I apreciate your will to help...
still you should go a bit easier on that
3. March 2007 - 10:35
#107
® -ED- 3:0 HTK/18.02.07
wrote:as for a revenge of the 1st match (condtitions detailled above) it should be simply the same conditions i.e. the same config.
same conditions would be great... on that time we (as challenging clan) gave you (the challenged clan) ALL maps on the cfg you prefered (you know we mainly played the XL cfg at that time).
That is a system I overtook from former proovingground times...
Since you are now the challenging clan that means you give us all maps on the cfg we prefer - e6? would be great
wrote:3rd I think rena idea is good, 1 match whole e5 and 1 whole e6, en don't really like play mixed gametype wars, we don't really like to play mixed confs even if we have to, it's not a big issue.
at all no problem to us... but as said we are really busy actually and for sure wont be able to set up 2 tdm games against you before the league starts...
and before we are dealing about what to play before and what after the league I think its better to play 1 map e6 and 2 e5
for ff... also on the new league voting you see that ED is kinda the only e5 clan wanting ff
3. March 2007 - 10:49
#108
® -ED- 3:0 HTK/18.02.07
Ehm, about friendly fire - i dont understand how people who like e6 dont want it on? It's only there to help minimize the spam further. 
It did wonders to minimize spam on bro cw's, anyway. And trust me, when you're playing with FF on, you very quickly develop the tendency to nervously look around before you shoot anything that might hurt your friends ;d
Actually, i would think that the e5 community should be the first one to make ff on a standard setting, ages ago. Hm. Looks like some people that say they dislike spamming actually enjoy it enough not to take a step further in eliminating it. 
Anyway, Bodz asked what bro ppl think about it, so there you go. Obviously i cannot speak for the whole community, but it's fair to assume many ppl will think the same as me. (if it weren't true, FF on wouldnt be a standard war setting here)
3. March 2007 - 12:35
#109
® -ED- 3:0 HTK/18.02.07
wrote:Ehm, about friendly fire - i dont understand how people who like e6 dont want it on? It's only there to help minimize the spam further.
Actually, i would think that the e5 community should be the first one to make ff on a standard setting, ages ago. Hm. Looks like some people that say they dislike spamming actually enjoy it enough not to take a step further in eliminating it.
Anyway, Bodz asked what bro ppl think about it, so there you go. Obviously i cannot speak for the whole community, but it's fair to assume many ppl will think the same as me. (if it weren't true, FF on wouldnt be a standard war setting here)
I think the main reason for this is that a large group comes from excessive where ff is never on, never has been either. Plus considdering that ff in ctf (the main gametype played from both clans) is useless i can see why people are against it.
@Bodz
Quote:
And last thing seth u are wrong ED wasn't invited to e6 league, neither to discuss about rules or the conf. I heard that it's bcz "they already know we wont like it" (not from u) is not an excuse, we still can talk and disagreing or agreing different points. But when it's private in en forums we can't do that, the community neither.
I don't know about all that from en private forum, i just saw the discussion on this forum, where ED did get invited into the league, same as KOD and both declined.
wrote:lol@sethy ur too funny man... if i was a woman, you would make me horny.
3. March 2007 - 17:01
#110
® -ED- 3:0 HTK/18.02.07
wrote:Excessive with FF =NO..never was and will be..We wont play with it.
dont make now excuses like FF wich was never played before.. :roll:
Lmao .
Shout 07:20:43
: yoo
: intimate photos are blocked
: Hi. I wanted to send a private message to a friend but it doesn't seem to be working.
: Kafa, you're a good guy, but I'm going to have to kill you. Sorry
: If I play better than Kafa on Freon BFG and Ultima on SexyFraggers RusrailBio config, I'll have to retire. You guys motivate me
: Hi all. Keep alive!
: Hello friends, I wish you the best of luck and success!
: Testing
: Who's online
There are currently 0 users and 33 guests online.
1st explo i don't like the way u talk, ur behaviour, the lack of respect for bro guys (the fact is that it's a public forum and every neutral person can say what he thinks regarding posts, and trust me bro guys are a way clever enough to do that)....u said u changed ?
u are rude, so u did good by ending this discussion nobody will waste his time reading ur exited comments.
2nd I said that ED is almost ok to play 2 e5 and 1 e6 maps, but as for a revenge of the 1st match (condtitions detailled above) it should be simply the same conditions i.e. the same config. Same for tdm as we booked it during the same period. But it's not as people like to say the word "excuse", it's just normal.
3rd I think rena idea is good, 1 match whole e5 and 1 whole e6, en don't really like play mixed gametype wars, we don't really like to play mixed confs even if we have to, it's not a big issue.
4th for ff, the moving stuff is not a good argument, bro players move now nearly as much as e5, even more with multijumps+shooting move, just look around u before shooting, instead of shooting everywhere like a whore lol. teamkills happen, it's an other parameter to consider that make the game more interesting and funny (yep funny to kill ur mates
)
The second argument with no pointing weapon is good yep i think it's the only one, but i prefer hundred times to kill my mate 1 or 2 times during a war bcz of this than having 15 minutes spam everywhere, and btw spam served camping too.
5th mainly to seth, yep my fault seth it's true that i have a tendancy to say that e6 is en config apologyse for this, i don't want to hurt other clans who did/like this conf by that. But it still remains that this conf kidda splitted e5 community, and that's bad for the community. I think also that en had the biggest contribution to this conf. Just my own opinion. And last thing seth u are wrong ED wasn't invited to e6 league, neither to discuss about rules or the conf. I heard that it's bcz "they already know we wont like it" (not from u) is not an excuse, we still can talk and disagreing or agreing different points. But when it's private in en forums we can't do that, the community neither.