Do you want things to change for the better here? PLEASE READ BEFORE VOTING!!!!!

38 replies [Last post]
animalchik
fala.q3's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts:
Re: Do you want things to change for the better here? PLEASE ...

Mow, i do not agree with the rule but in fact, the poll clearly showed people want to have that rule implemented and i can only thank god that my connection is not laggy any more while during my stay in here since now almost 7 years i always had lags and i know exactly both sides of it.

If u guys want to get rid of that rule just ask Rank Mods to do another poll about only with two options witch clearly going to show what people want.

eg. we should limit laggy peoples by ranking rule?
YES/NO


i do think even if the rule going to be voted out the minority of people with big mouth and charisma of the troll going to scream and insult the people who removed the rule. And if the rule going to stay anyway by the majority of votes the same story going to happen...

unfortunelly i do not understand what u did mean by the transparency and to what it actually do refers.

I am addicted to life.

madbringer
Madbringer's picture
Offline
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts:
Re: Do you want things to change for the better here? PLEASE ...
animalchik wrote:

the poll clearly showed people want to have that rule implemented

Um, no.

animalchik wrote:

If u guys want to get rid of that rule just ask Rank Mods to do another poll about only with two options witch clearly going to show what people want.

What's wrong with the first one?

animalchik
fala.q3's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts:
Re: Do you want things to change for the better here? PLEASE ...

Both first options are strongly connected, u know it and i know it. Everyone who do not want to push their believes so strongly that hes ready try convincing people black is actually a white knows it (I was against that rule). Thats exactly why i have pointed out to made a second poll with only two options to choice [YES/NO] to get rid the problem of current voting poll interpretation, because it is interpreted in both ways by people who trying to use any argument to back up their believes.

But as i already have written even if this going to be BLACK/WHITE people sill won't going to let it go, and going to find another arguments to cancel the voting poll.

I am addicted to life.

madbringer
Madbringer's picture
Offline
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts:
Re: Do you want things to change for the better here? PLEASE ...

Yeah, but you'll never reach a consensus or a definitive difference in numbers between either option, you must know that.

I have no idea why this is such an issue, anyway. You have referees, make them decide themselves if a lagging player should be allowed to partake in the cw. Or just drop the thing altogether, coz all it does is split this community in half.

rUnThEoN?!
Skullheadq3's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
DE Germany
Re: Do you want things to change for the better here? PLEASE ...

just for the record, any democratic poll about an lagger rule while be obsolete because e+ has more nonlaggers then laggers.

hurrenson: "This idiot is apparently not familiar with a rail/sniper style."

METEORKID
Forum moderator Rank moderator
Meteorkid's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts:
Re: Do you want things to change for the better here? PLEASE ...

So its simple lets the ref decide who is lagging to much. and make sure the ref is impartial (both clans agree on the chosen ref) monitoring laggy player is a refs job and it should not be up to a rules to decide only on what the ref deems as fair play.


animalchik
fala.q3's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts:
Re: Do you want things to change for the better here? PLEASE ...

First of decide if u wan't to have rule like that at all as it seems situations needs it ;/ or any other variant of if will end up bad ;F

There are some good ideas and the sum of it not necessarily must be good idea also (plusN alike situation)

I am addicted to life.

!@#$%&*( terror )_
terror's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts:
Re: Do you want things to change for the better here? PLEASE ...
animalchik wrote:

Thats more than obvious the place need changes, the problem lay not in the moderation or wrong rules, the problem laying in the thing nobody willing to show respect for anyone and the people who wearing Admin/Moderators signatures are even scared to voice their opinions because they quickly becoming a target and blamed for the whole worlds problems.

That's only because they lost their respect or they never had it and never will.
Standing above normal users and acting like masters of slaves is already gone too far,
I'm talking about 3-4 years here, it's going deeper and deeper to intollerance, chaos,
anarchy.

IMO let people pick their new moderators and admins.
I mean, not by poll, but by discussion. Open discussion about new start.

METEORKID
Forum moderator Rank moderator
Meteorkid's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts:
Re: Do you want things to change for the better here? PLEASE ...
rUnThEoN?! wrote:

just for the record, any democratic poll about an lagger rule while be obsolete because e+ has more nonlaggers then laggers.

as skull said they are not as many laggers so they can be dealt with by the refs because the sitution is not bad enough to call for a rule implemented. if we are unsure why not do a research based poll saying

    demo poll ^^
     

  • i get under 60 ping  
  • i get 61-120 ping  
  • i get over 120 ping

also we must make sure we understand what a suspicions ping signature would look like. (it would look like have two different pings at once swapping very fast, any others??)


METEORKID
Forum moderator Rank moderator
Meteorkid's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts:
Re: Do you want things to change for the better here? PLEASE ...
Quote:
Quote:

IMO let people pick their new moderators and admins.
I mean, not by poll, but by discussion. Open discussion about new start.

i agree the it should be set out like a basic election. where as each wannable mod/admin whatever would post a leading statement why they think they should be mod on one thread with no comments (statement thread) then have a discussion thread. this should give people an idea of what the mods actualy do and allow them to have there say.