who are you to say i dont know how many different switch times you used? :roll:

im saying things from the things you posted. nothing more, nothing less.
you post why you consider him a camper, i say those are the exact same points i consider him camper on. not guessing your points. using points you posted.
someone is paranoid here...

how do you know i cant? :roll:

so what you are trying to say is, that im guilty of not writing a big disclamer in my sig: "everything i write is my opinion and im not stating it as fact. consider every sentence i write to have 'in my opinion' on the end".

i used to include a lot of IMO and IMHO in my posts before, but i assumed people figured out that its just my style of writing, so i stoped. whats the problem with that?

read above. i dont do it all over the place. if it makes you feel easier ill put that disclamer in my sig. while im at it ill put labels on everything, so people couldnt missunderstand anything i say. *end sarcasm*

no i tell him my definition of it. if i was to say "It is like that and cant be different" i would have posted evidence, linked to reference, quoted other authors, etc.

since i havent done any of it, it is my opinion alone. not an unbreakable fact.

wrote:

SuperBo! wrote:

Again... who are you to say how many different switchtimes i have played with?

who are you to say i dont know how many different switch times you used? :roll:

wrote:

how do you know i cant? :roll:

OMG you really are quite full of yourself..

Thanks for proving my point

/ignore attentionjunkies

Geez guys, you've taken this discussion to the center of off-topic city now .

I think it should be clear to anyone, that every single person on this planet will have a different opinion on something than the other. But you get off the point here, imo.

Back in the Quake 1 days, there were clear definitions of player archetypes described and set out as community standards by the masses, and one of these archetypes was a Camper. What you guys are doing here, is mixing two player archetypes. One is Sniper, other is Camper. By the general definition (from Toby Goldstones UO Quake FAQ):

[Sniper]
These guys main strategy is to get an explosive weapons and
camp in a hard to hit spot raining grenades or missiles down on your
head. These guys are annoying. I find the best strategy against them is
to ignore them, or wait them out. They have to come out for more
ammo sooner or later, and when they do, load them full of buckshot.
Snipers tend to have very poor engagement skills, which is the main
reason that they snipe in the first place.

And

[Camper]
These guys are pretty easy, usually. They just sit near
respawn spots with a weapon, and try to kill whoever
respawns there. Usually you can sneak up on these guys, because they
don't pay attention surroundings. Not only that, but they will rarely
get many frags, because they don't hunt people, get armor or ammo...They just sit there.

Of course, definitions get out-dated, games evolve, and one main inconsistence is the lack of items in E+ that are worth defending (aside from the occasional power-up, of course), but, in general, i don't think much has changed since then. And imo, Giz is neither, he's just a Sneaky Bastard

Next time I hear someone in the next room i won't walk and wait for him to come. I'll start spamming mg around to let him know i am near. With this said, the discussion is over for me.