User login
awards 2009?
14. November 2009 - 15:55
#41
awards 2009?
+ "The most annoying player"
14. November 2009 - 16:15
#42
awards 2009?
From all propositions, IMO those are best:
best player
best clan
best clan-leader
Best newcomer to e5 side
Best newcomer to Plus side
Most progressive player
Biggest loss of shape
Most improved clan
Biggest failure clan
Most Honourable player
Clanhopper of the year
FUNNYIEST GUY OF THE YEAR
MOST ANNOYING GUY OF THE YEAR
best e+ supporter
best e+ related movie
forum spamer of the year
BEST SERVER
BEST ADMIN/MODERATOR
Best e5 ctf atacker
Best e5 ctf defender
Best e5 ctf middler
Cap of the year
Frag of the year
On this point we already have too many categories,
making even more will make this ridiculous.
14. November 2009 - 16:23
#43
awards 2009?
Imo - Make a few positive awards (Not to many) and discard all negative ones 
14. November 2009 - 16:25
#44
![^[Evil]Monkey](/files/screenname/81c4e09290cab74aa030cdb31d6ee09c.webp "^[Evil]Monkey"){kind=small}
awards 2009?
wrote:Imo - Make a few positive awards (Not to many) and discard all negative ones
gotta have a few 
just make sure the ones aren't insulting
like biggest failure clan, that sounds a little harsh lol
14. November 2009 - 16:43
#45
![S3c|¯3¯|¯ [EN]](/files/screenname/fb48bf71f868792b4724881a0b7912c5.webp "S3c|¯3¯|¯ [EN]"){kind=small}
awards 2009?
generally the idea is good...
I see tendencies for a "hall of fame" and a "hall of shame".
Im not sure if a "hall of shame" would make sense... some ppl might like the idea of pointing out the shame. while the "idiots" themselves will simply be happy to be highlighted.
spamming, clanhopping, etc. shouldnt be rewarded with an award... even if it is an award of shame.
Anyways there shouldnt be too many categories. Imo maybe 1 or 2 categories for whole community, 4-5 categories for plus and e5... I would leave rail only out for this year... it is closely to plus and just too new.
categories like best player, clan, clan-leader, etc. seem very vague to me.
I like the rewards for e+/community support tho, seeing all the new guys who helped e+ to get back to activity. Awards should be for things you help everyone with... an improved player/clan does it for him/themselves and automatically get rewards in the arena.
cmon... loss of shape? failure clan? ppl suggesting this should get one of the shame awards 
14. November 2009 - 16:50
#46
awards 2009?
wrote:cmon... loss of shape? failure clan? ppl suggesting this should get one of the shame awards
A tidy way to reinforce one's feeling of superiority. Although, obviously, if you have the "best", you must have the "worst". Highlights go both ways, it's just a matter of making it tasteful and not overtly offending, since this is a community wide project.
This is a good idea, if executed right. As some other people said, don't flood this with redundant categories, just pick the most prominent ones and stick with those.
I think Matt bulls-eyed the best jury nominees, maybe i'd add Mircwar, Secret, Mow, Skinnis, Achmed and Matt himself to the list, those seem to be the most level-headed people around, and least likely to follow some personal bias (there are more people but i don't really see them around lately).
14. November 2009 - 20:45
#47
awards 2009?
Well i have to disagree . Just because you highlight the best does not mean you should highlight the worst. Imo doing all this' hall of shame' and the 'worst' player at something is stupid. I tend to not read half the flame on these forums. last thing i wanna do is hear of people getting awards for it 
, I still think sticking with the good side of q3 should be a better idea. Also as much as alot of people dont seem to give a fuck from what i can tell on the forums. and do like to see people humilated ect. Maybe take a minute to think about how the person recieving the award might feel. but then again its all for 'fun' isnt it as long as your happy at the end of it
14. November 2009 - 21:06
#48
awards 2009?
It's not an award, it's a slap on the wrist. But yeah, maybe the really bad people don't need the additional attention. *shrug*
15. November 2009 - 12:11
#49
awards 2009?
wrote:Imo - Make a few positive awards (Not to many) and discard all negative ones
This is one great idea Hazo,if handled right of course. I would have to agree with Laktos in this matter,considering the fact that majority of people here don't understand the meaning of 'irony' in the first place. Nominating people for all sorts of more or less negative awards or whatnot will sure as hell beat up a shitstorm. Although,an award for 'Forum troll of 2009' would work imho,and perhaps an award for funniest post(lot of work to find it but wth ).
I would gladly take part in a 'jury' or w/e you want to call it. Thx for the trust Mad 
My 2 cents
//skinnis
15. November 2009 - 15:41
#50
awards 2009?
I think one of jury should be Firefox, she almost all the time on servers. She saw all of us in our good or bad shape. For me, most objective person for this.
Shout 08:27:09
: try my gaming group https://discord...
: Khaz, I smell alcohol-induced nostalgia here!
: This game was so great, till today there’s no game that is better. Cant forget all the years playing this.
: Hey khaz. Yop would be nice to go back into the 2006 or 2007 for example and enjoy this game with all of those great people. We had a great times.
: Hello there.
I really wish I could travel back time to play with you guys once again and strafe around ermap3, this was so chilling.
Best regards, hope you’re all doing okay.
: hi _LB I SEE THAT TOO 2 spectators all day on the Carnage Elite server weird
: Sup.
: I see 2 spectators all day on the Carnage Elite server with random names and equal ping times. What's the story on this? Anyone?
: although it’s unlikely that anyone will go there xD
: Dear FREON server administration, maybe it’s a good idea to convert the CTF server to rail duel 1v1. r4e09f.cfg?? can anyone support me? 
Who's online
There are currently 1 user and 8 guests online.
