Another Pc Help Thread

43 replies [Last post]
*[UO]*OSKALIBER'
Oskaliber's picture
Offline
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts:
Another Pc Help Thread

Ratz, why should I care about damn HTT if there is no noticeable difference. Intel beat AMD in all other cases. I'm not fanboy, there were good times for AMD too, but actually Intel offer is much better.

Riku, take E8500.


>> Undead Order Clan Site & Forum <<

# Razer Diamondback # SteelPad QcK # Philips SHP2500 # Flatron F700B

rUnThEoN?!
Skullheadq3's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
DE Germany
Another Pc Help Thread

basically, amd has more direct ram input as far as i know, intel always had slower ram input, making amd cpu's more effective on same mhz.
(just talking about expirience, i dont know actual cpu strucute that good)
amd was always known for being faster in games on same mhz, while intel was always faster in normal programs.

hurrenson: "This idiot is apparently not familiar with a rail/sniper style."

bert
Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts:
Another Pc Help Thread

that was in pentium era, they got core2 now which is clock for clock faster then amd in most cases.
but when it comes to huge data transfer like in winrar or certoun games, the core2 starts to fall back.
amd has the htt bus which allows them to communicate much much faster with peripherals and also can act as cpu interconnect.
thats why amd is still leader in 4p market where intel just cant keep up.
if you have a slow dual core intel and you got things in the background running, you might notice lags in quake. amd wont have this as much as intel.
also with heavy gpu load, the intel cant feed the gpu constant data where amd can, so some have reported the amd chips perform some games smoother then intel. same situations have been reported in windows responses.
but since intel is faster clock for clock and clocks higher, they can compensate for this alot.
nehalem will change all this but tests have shown that there isnt much to gain like peope think. and is extremely expensive.

amd has released a new 5400be, unlocked multi, probably oc's to 3.2ghz on air easy(released 2 weeks ago). costs 70 while the 8500 costs 140 euro and clocks to 4ghz and beyond if you are lucky. so intel is faster but costs more. or buy a cheap intel dual core and clock to 3.5+ghz.

officiallydead
Offline
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts:
Another Pc Help Thread

well, still dont know what to choose Worried but i ll taker a greater look on amd aswell...

are there any uptodate site which have reviews and benchmarks tests of cpus and gpus??

google is not my friend cause i cant find really good ones!!!!

bert
Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts:
Another Pc Help Thread
officiallydead
Offline
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts:
Another Pc Help Thread

its not that i have a shitload of money Big grin my grandpa has Winking

bert
Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts:
Another Pc Help Thread

nice Big grin

*updated my post ^
as you can see, 50 fps to 70 fps for the 8500 above amd.
but you must pay 2 times more.
thats why people often say amd is better bang for buck.

officiallydead
Offline
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts:
Another Pc Help Thread

so what about this pc?

gpu: Radeon HD 4870 X2

cpu: e8500

mobo: ? asus P5Q-E

and ram: ocz DDR2 PC2-8500 4GB+

??

edit:

almost 800 euro for this with a cooler!

*[UO]*OSKALIBER'
Oskaliber's picture
Offline
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts:
Another Pc Help Thread

It's ok. You can also go for HD 4870 without X2 if you want save some money. Which series of OCZ are you talking about? I'd rather take G.Skill PQ.


>> Undead Order Clan Site & Forum <<

# Razer Diamondback # SteelPad QcK # Philips SHP2500 # Flatron F700B

officiallydead
Offline
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts:
Another Pc Help Thread

yeah thats i want to buy too Smug

no i want a perfect gc Smug 400 euro isnt that much for a GOOOOOOOOOD gc Smug grandpa doesnt know for what he is purchasing Smug

btw

do i need some special mobo for hd 4870 x2?? i mean corrsfirex or sli something?