®R.C.A.L # 1// Round6 // pTs 2 : 0 TwT // 16.02.2014

49 replies [Last post]
echooo ^
echo's picture
Offline
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts:
Re: R.C.A.L # 1// Round6 // pTs 2 : 0 TwT // 16.02.2014

well, im aint complaining, just because that was also our fault that we did not react at that moment. idk how about rank moderators look at this case. but if that is needed we can reply our round with pTs, np.

eu.jeff
jeffrey's picture
Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts:
NL Netherlands
Re: R.C.A.L # 1// Round6 // pTs 2 : 0 TwT // 16.02.2014
echooo ^ wrote:

ffsQuad vs pTs - our game should not be valid as well but played once again, because we played different config then league config.
there was no respawn after end of each round. how about this?

Yes, and other games also before i found out. But then EVERY clan who has not played on the normal config needs to replay won / lost wars. So yes, i will now go look on demos for League wars that have been played on the wrong config and force them all to replay. After that some clans will start to complain, "but we won and now need to replay, its not our fault but the server owners fault because he/she did not upload the correct config" and bla bla. So tell me, you want to replay everything? and have a big drama?
Its because camel uploaded the wrong config to the root and q3fan who editted the config to his own desire.

alienM
alienM's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts:
Re: R.C.A.L # 1// Round6 // pTs 2 : 0 TwT // 16.02.2014

Jeff, with all (no)respect, you are terrible league/cup organizer. For goodness of this community, I really hope that this is last event (at least related for clan, don't care about 1v1) which you will organize... Talk to the hand
Also as person, you sucks a lot, because you are not able to respect rules which were written by your hand! Pfff... Sick

-C4-KOSZMIT
Rank moderator
Offline
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts:
Re: R.C.A.L # 1// Round6 // pTs 2 : 0 TwT // 16.02.2014
alienM wrote:

Jeff, with all (no)respect, you are terrible league/cup organizer. For goodness of this community, I really hope that this is last event (at least related for clan, don't care about 1v1) which you will organize... Talk to the hand
Also as person, you sucks a lot, because you are not able to respect rules which were written by your hand! Pfff... Sick

Lets not overreact, and dont hurt each other feelings Tongue
Lets just say jeff happens..

- Gentelmans, we are dealing with someone here who has absolutely no life..
- How do you kill that which has no life..?

/
q3fun's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts:
Re: R.C.A.L # 1// Round6 // pTs 2 : 0 TwT // 16.02.2014
-C4-KOSZMIT wrote:

JUMPS'FPS! wrote:

p.s Koszmit, if picking tie map could be so obvious, can't you point me couple of games where clans were picking TIE map as non-tie on this league?

I guess it wasn't obvious for anyone, otherwise we would see a lot of played on overkill.

My "obvious" was an irony ;] I didnt know about this rule but jeff pretended that everybody should know because he answered to nana Tongue

You are wrong! Check first (head) league-post.

No not one word that says that TIEMAP-LIST included in the Main Map-List.

Consequently may be selected only as Tie-Map.

eu.jeff wrote:

NanamoOOon wrote:
dunno in Happy
Just to be sure: 4 maps as tie, means winner of first map rejects twice and other clan reject only once?


Read Rules.


Yes unless 1 map is already chosen to play by 1 clan, then you cannot pick that map anymore.

she asked one, he said quite another...
it's cannot be taken seriously and can not considered as an addition to the rules

zarzyn
zarzyn's picture
Offline
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts:
Re: R.C.A.L # 1// Round6 // pTs 2 : 0 TwT // 16.02.2014
eu.jeff wrote:


And zar.pk3 you are the worst of them all x))))

Take Your Nat Cake and F$ck you Love struck manage is responsible for making clear rules for members

  • i note message about picking map from tie list. But i see here much more people complain about it HF in your Sh!t

Happy

echooo ^
echo's picture
Offline
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts:
Re: R.C.A.L # 1// Round6 // pTs 2 : 0 TwT // 16.02.2014

stop unnecessary flames. we should be gratefull that some1 take care to start cup and is in manage to watch for all of this. jeff could not do anything - and then noone could not play at all. so, lets be fair about it.
im sure there is possible to solve it. for sure without making flames.

eu.jeff
jeffrey's picture
Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts:
NL Netherlands
Re: R.C.A.L # 1// Round6 // pTs 2 : 0 TwT // 16.02.2014
zarzyn wrote:

Take Your Nat Cake and F$ck you Love struck

Polski polski xd
That is the worst reference towards American Pie movies ever x)))

I guess you did not finish that joke.pk3 yet )))))))))))))

/
q3fun's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts:
Re: R.C.A.L # 1// Round6 // pTs 2 : 0 TwT // 16.02.2014
alienM wrote:

Jeff, with all (no)respect, you are terrible league/cup organizer. For goodness of this community, I really hope that this is last event (at least related for clan, don't care about 1v1) which you will organize... Talk to the hand
Also as person, you sucks a lot, because you are not able to respect rules which were written by your hand! Pfff... Sick

f1

/
q3fun's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts:
Re: R.C.A.L # 1// Round6 // pTs 2 : 0 TwT // 16.02.2014
eu.jeff wrote:

Ref: fiend ( Thanks AGAIN! )

i think demos is bad, unsuitable for rank Tongue