signatures

9 replies [Last post]

3. May 2005 - 15:44

Offline

Joined: Dec 2004

Posts:

hmmm.. signatures ...? why the width is limited now? grrr?

3. May 2005 - 16:29

Offline

Joined: Aug 2004

Posts:

signatures

You know I also brought pics to sigs in this forums no1 had then untill I started

CLEMSON TIGERS ARE #1
**RETIRED**1st E+ forum whore Muhahaha :mrgreen:
*2nd highest NON-CHEATED post count***RETIRED**

3. May 2005 - 17:35

Offline

Joined: Mar 2004

Posts:

signatures

i think cause there were some of us having to large signatures

3. May 2005 - 19:59

Offline

Joined: Aug 2004

Posts:

signatures

like some of us here

4. May 2005 - 5:11

Offline

Joined: Nov 2004

Posts:

signatures

WTF? my sig is no bigger that 569 px mine is 500px X 144px, so let it back, slip's sig is bigger than mine and stil shows his sig is 520x263 so what is wrong with min, define your criteria about sig size before doing something like this, don't waste my time.

4. May 2005 - 5:39

Offline

Joined: Dec 2004

Posts:

signatures

ive resized mine alreadu 550x146 dunno why isit not displayed ;|

4. May 2005 - 7:49

Offline

Joined: Jan 2005

Posts:

signatures

thats funny.. mine works fine

Another post by RedKnight that makes no freakin sense!

4. May 2005 - 12:05

Offline

Joined: Jan 2004

Posts:

signatures

bycose pic signatures, slowing down all forum, and kiling badwitch limits, that why, if someone starts watching forum witch 128/64kbps connection for him its not fun to load all pics, and some persons thinks not only about self...

4. May 2005 - 13:31

Offline

Joined: Mar 2004

Posts:

signatures

yep, i like pic signatures but here i have to agree with HQ.