User login
plusN.cfg | 2.07
29. May 2009 - 17:29
#32
plusN.cfg | 2.07
better try than think in this case 
Wanna avoid seeying mow, skull & co 
Check this peacefull place
29. May 2009 - 17:32
#33
plusN.cfg | 2.07
wrote:I take back what I said previously. Since the original developers don't give a fuck about enhancing this mod/cfg. Also what you are doing is a positive thing, good luck with your config. As long as you take on board suggestions from others and not just "fix it how you want it to be" then this improved plus cfg could be a real winner.
I'm glad to hear that.
there must be some understanding, peoples opinions matters a lot, but there is also mine influence, and how I see the things, I want to archive a common goal >less camping and spamming< that means there are noticeable deference’s in game play, that was not even liked by myself, because I'm convinced people expect weapons going to behave as they used to behave, if they not doing that, we are annoyed by the fact, but I’m willing to give it a shot, and I don't really know what going to be the final result, but I hope everyone going to win on that
censorship on YouTube sucks rabbit balls
29. May 2009 - 17:54
#34
plusN.cfg | 2.07
config beer freeze is too slow. my opinion 
but it's ryly slowly and sux now. Aim freeze speed is very good and after game on aim when go on beer I can go make coofe when do bfg jump 
Histroy :
PLUS = FOX Clan >> GSE Clan >> BBS Clan >> KTM Clan >> BURN* Clan >> BBSquad Clan >> MR Clan >> VENDETTA Clan >> OUT of gaming
RAIL = DUNNO Clan >> OF Clan >> PW Clan >> OUT of gaming
29. May 2009 - 17:56
#35
plusN.cfg | 2.07
yes, i think same, create plusN.cfg faster.
29. May 2009 - 18:39
#36
plusN.cfg | 2.07
wrote:yes, i think same, create plusN.cfg faster.
that won't going to happen, or at least I’m not going to resign from the idea as that fast
weapons have order now, that was abused after 1.03 was out
for the beginning of plus.cfg idea was to have fast switch for mg-type of weapons (mg, lg, pg), and slower switch for power-type weapons (bfg, rail, sg, rl)
so if u going to ignore new possibilities, and try spamming only by powerful weapons u must face the fact they are stronger and slower
as the examples
- the movement combination gl+bfg is faster than it was in plus.cfg
- lg->mg switch has only 7ms, 140 in plus.cfg
- sg->lg/mg/pg combos are ultra fast
- rg -> lg/mg/pg combos are ultra fast
- bfg -> lg/mg/pg combos are ultra fast
- rg ->bfg/sg/rl combos are slowed down
- switching to bfg, need 130ms and it’s faster than it was in plus.cfg
The final conclusion:
- plusN.cfg is faster than plus.cfg
- plusN.cfg do not allow spam using only 3 guns as it was happening before
censorship on YouTube sucks rabbit balls
29. May 2009 - 21:24
#37
plusN.cfg | 2.07
wrote:for the beginning of plus.cfg idea was to have fast switch for mg-type of weapons (mg, lg, pg), and slower switch for power-type weapons (bfg, rail, sg, rl)
Are u talking about plus or plusN? If about plus, it sounds like was one of ppl who wrote cfg or tell me how could u know such info mr cpmha player.
btw could u remove "plus" from cfg name cuz it suggest im involved in this cfg. thx in advance.
29. May 2009 - 21:28
#38
![mow Q [EN]](/files/screenname/8646b528fbbe1090dc61e0f29405d1b3.webp "mow Q [EN]"){kind=small}
plusN.cfg | 2.07
FEL!X wrote:
for the beginning of plus.cfg idea was to have fast switch for mg-type of weapons (mg, lg, pg), and slower switch for power-type weapons (bfg, rail, sg, rl)Are u talking about plus or plusN? If about plus, it sounds like was one of ppl who wrote cfg or tell me how could u know such info mr cpmha player.
btw could u remove "plus" from cfg name cuz it suggest im involved in this cfg. thx in advance.
well, even if he denie it, he is hq, still thinking about it
29. May 2009 - 22:50
#39
plusN.cfg | 2.07
FEL!X wrote:
btw could u remove "plus" from cfg name cuz it suggest im involved in this cfg. thx in advance.
I believe the name wasn't copyrighted :] And everybody who want to check the author will look for it in cfg itself.
29. May 2009 - 22:52
#40
plusN.cfg | 2.07
wrote:I believe the name wasn't copyrighted :]
Do copyrights have to cover for simple respect?
I like how the config develops, by the way. Good job.
Shout 13:14:41
: Khaz, I smell alcohol-induced nostalgia here!
: This game was so great, till today there’s no game that is better. Cant forget all the years playing this.
: Hey khaz. Yop would be nice to go back into the 2006 or 2007 for example and enjoy this game with all of those great people. We had a great times.
: Hello there.
I really wish I could travel back time to play with you guys once again and strafe around ermap3, this was so chilling.
Best regards, hope you’re all doing okay.
: hi _LB I SEE THAT TOO 2 spectators all day on the Carnage Elite server weird
: Sup.
: I see 2 spectators all day on the Carnage Elite server with random names and equal ping times. What's the story on this? Anyone?
: although it’s unlikely that anyone will go there xD
: Dear FREON server administration, maybe it’s a good idea to convert the CTF server to rail duel 1v1. r4e09f.cfg?? can anyone support me? 
: Hi. Is there any way to host an excessiveplus server in South Africa. What is needed - Please let me know
Who's online
There are currently 1 user and 4 guests online.
at the very beginning we tried 2sec and it was way to much, there must be really balanced value for it, I’m convinced 1.1sec is perfect, but nothing stops us of trying 1.5sec for new release, I'm also playing noGhost where that protection is set to one rail cycle (1.5sec) and I find it to long
that’s make me wonder if we should try it out or not?
censorship on YouTube sucks rabbit balls
