I would vote for people like:
camel, zont, kaktus, seebz, fate, kicek, turas, riddler, equilibrium, larry, marcus.

100% sure that those guys would be objective and would make this place democratic.
For many years of observation I can say that they have big respect here and never
participated in any flamewar.

edit:
And don't add just 2 or 3 mods we need more.
They need to work as a team and cooperate with users.

terror you don't reply, who manipulate me ?

I think you try to create something on me
you would not just pathological liar ?

@ zaxtor
U are very trusty person, that's why I wrote "easy to manipulate"
Besides creating and closing clan and opening and closing again same
clan in period of few days doens't show u are very mentally stable person.
Furthermore I don't know u at all and couple weeks ago u acted like
my best buddy, telling me all your problems and asking for help
Bit naive I would say.
U are cool guy, but to be honest u need to grow up lil bit (dunno how old are u xD
but seems not very)

cheers

=======================
Funny, I watched new Robin Hood movie (the one with russel crowe)
Robin had nice speech which reunited england with king.
I though all will be ok but in the end King didn't kept his word...
Hopefully we won't have simillar situation here xD

People watch the movie today and think about it pls

as shown by my practice in other forums (for which there are disagreements, incitement to hatred on the basis of nationality, a lot of trolls) vote among users for the post of moderator _not_ lead to positive results. The same effect you get if you're asking in the open on the forum who wants to become a moderator.
Moderator should select the site owner without giving any reason. He must fully trust him.

WRONG !!!!

We had that already, the revolution is because of that.
Because of creating CASTS of friends who manage others.

We want democracy now. People will chose new moderators.