Wierd poll
I dont like too many players in one clan - simple reason that most cannot play in a cw - which is sad.
However, the rest of the players can improve their own skill playing against stronger players. Its more organised to train together than say play on public...
so 2 sides to a coin. who has the right to say yes or no.... everyone does
Some clans have 15 players - but 10 of them are super good players, some clans have 30 players - but perhaps only 5 are super good.
If someone told me - u have too many players in my clan - I would very politely tell them -- thanks but not your fucking business !

Lol, maybe better lets cancel all clans and lets invite CLs to pick players one by one and create everthing from the start. Each CL can pick one player in one round, than all clans will be equal... Sorry but pointless imo..! Quod erat demonstrandum >> poll.

Same answers from same ppl ! Don't expect something else.

players have no limitation for number of teams and can be even 70ppl on a team (there are some examples). So the answer : 20inactive players on same clan are almost friends isn't convincing.

on other case why 20active players should stay together and 15 from them spec? if a clan has 10active ppl why don't we have cw 10vs10 ?

--------------------------------------------------

no limitation implies play more important games (6vs6 at least) for big clans.

limitation set = more small clans and more wars (on that case, inactives should get kicked when limitation reached) as said before 15 seems a good number

wrote:

(on that case, inactives should get kicked when limitation reached) as said before 15 seems a good number

And that helps clans in what way, come on, impress me Ali.

If the composition of one, more than 16 makes no sense. In Q3 is a limit of 32 players playing simultaneously. If there are 2 trains - then 32 players ))