gold wars

73 replies [Last post]
28. November 2007 - 17:42
#61
'ASH
Offline
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts:
gold wars

Abarth is right!

Let's play a league with every clan, each clan pick a map and his lovely favourite conf, for tie map, e5 cfg unless both clan agree to play another one.
Cfg pool could be e3 (lol!), e5, e5r, e5s (lol!) and e6. And flame allowed only during warmup. Big grin

Who care for clan ranking ? Let's just play.

Thinking:

Top
28. November 2007 - 17:51
#62
|AbarTh|
AbarTh's picture
Offline
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts:
gold wars
'ASH wrote:

Let's just play.

Thinking:

F1 for "Let's just play!

Who agree with us, quote it like me!

Nothing is impossible

Top
28. November 2007 - 18:16
#63
*BNT* TYP!
Offline
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts:
gold wars

Playing fun wars is for ever possible, at any time.
If guys dont want to take part of a League and/or ranking system, then dont sign up for it.

I think leagues and ranking are fun, and gives you an extra boost of excitement and to perform well and better all the time.

pure e5r whore

Top
28. November 2007 - 18:28
#64
'ASH
Offline
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts:
gold wars

Rank wars are just welcome because that makes people play more serious, so an interesting different game that u cant have in public server. That's a bit too bad that some players dont want to get involved because they may be less good on another cfg that their favourite. And I don't think play some maps in a cfg u don't link is gonna kill all ur fun, makes u angry or whatever! Tongue

About anticamp, try this in your cfg :

Anti Camp {

/* Anti Camp Protection*/
Time: 2;

/* Anti Camp Radius*/
Radius: 150;

/* Anti Camp Damage*/
Damage: 1000;
}

I would love to see those kind of settings in every ranks war (not in public, that would be too hard), especially plus.cfg! :

Top
28. November 2007 - 18:29
#65
madbringer
Madbringer's picture
Offline
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts:
gold wars

Yes, let's make Freeze impossible to play! :thumbright:

And reduce TDM to breathless running around, for the sake of it.

Top
28. November 2007 - 18:31
#66
'ASH
Offline
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts:
gold wars

for tdm, Mr obvious.

Top
28. November 2007 - 18:32
#67
madbringer
Madbringer's picture
Offline
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts:
gold wars

I already wrote that anticamp is a half-assed method of eliminating camping. Give players a reason to move, don't force them to do it.

And read my edit, mr F5.

Top
28. November 2007 - 18:56
#68
'ASH
Offline
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts:
gold wars

give another reason to move? that's easy, no weapon except mg on respawn (or maybe nade or even bfg to fit with excessive feature), u have to grab them all around the map! like a real tdm ... dunno how this would work, maybe too much unbalanced once u have the magic rail!

otherwise, have to pick ammo ... so less spam.

Top
28. November 2007 - 19:00
#69
madbringer
Madbringer's picture
Offline
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts:
gold wars

Well, that's my point. It's easy to give people reasons for moving. It's harder to make them accept the changes that would be introduced to the core gameplay of E+, be it E5, E5r, E6, Plus, or other any popular config.

And it would take more than one simple change, it would take a few major ones, to reduce camping to the point it wouldn't be annoying anymore.

Top
28. November 2007 - 21:33
#70
rUnThEoN?!
Skullheadq3's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
DE Germany
gold wars
madbringer wrote:

Well, that's my point. It's easy to give people reasons for moving. It's harder to make them accept the changes that would be introduced to the core gameplay of E+, be it E5, E5r, E6, Plus, or other any popular config.

And it would take more than one simple change, it would take a few major ones, to reduce camping to the point it wouldn't be annoying anymore.

if ur managing it right, it should be possible to make a clan move without any changes in config.

hurrenson: "This idiot is apparently not familiar with a rail/sniper style."

Top