*FEAR* vs A.L.C 3.O7.05

14 replies [Last post]
8. September 2005 - 21:40
#11
{D*R*T} FAITH
Faith's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts:
*FEAR* vs A.L.C 3.O7.05

i quite dont get it Thinking

lol if fear didnt take it as a cw why did they post results?

Quote:
yes i think so too Saint....its about clans not a 1v1 or 2v2 fights. I think it shoud be at list 5vs5 ...or there must be other ranking for less ppl.

guys if two clans setup a match [no mather how many players 2v2 or 6v6] its still called a clan war . . .

Top
8. September 2005 - 21:59
#12
saint
Saint's picture
Offline
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts:
SE Sweden
*FEAR* vs A.L.C 3.O7.05

I didnt say i think this game should not be counted, just that maybe there should be such a rule like a minimum amount of players required for a cw or i could go and play cw:s on my own. Its just a opinion so chill. Winking.

Top
8. September 2005 - 22:10
#13
2!S*vo!d*
void's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts:
*FEAR* vs A.L.C 3.O7.05
W L C wrote:

i quite dont get it Thinking

lol if fear didnt take it as a cw why did they post results?

Simple, Martin organised the CW and posted the result, f1x didn't think it was valid and posted, magnetic agreed and posted too.

Top
9. September 2005 - 0:52
#14
**LSF** XERXES
G-Ray's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts:
*FEAR* vs A.L.C 3.O7.05

not about this game but why should u play 2v2, its more reason to play 1v1 or 5v5 ...or at list 3vs3..

Top