*ED* vs [ZER] e5.cfg 3:0 for *ED*

22 replies [Last post]
15. January 2006 - 22:32
akro.
symptom's picture
Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts:

gametype: TDM
result 3:0 for ED
maps: 6++, dm6, ctf1

6++:

ctf1:

screen from dm6, i dont have but score is 391:180 (i dont be sure)- FOR ED

ggs both Cool ...

Top
15. January 2006 - 23:39
#1
{D*R*T} BODZ!
XbODz's picture
Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts:
*ED* vs [ZER] e5.cfg 3:0 for *ED*

yeah why not posting e5 results here too, nice idea akro Winking

gg zer, they surprised me, i though it wouldn't be so hard

Top
16. January 2006 - 0:12
#2
*RuBeN!*
Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts:
*ED* vs [ZER] e5.cfg 3:0 for *ED*

Symp... I have already asked you for these graphics... I'm pretty sure you can't have them this way using Quake in-game commands... you said you had a freaky cfg... can you send it to me please (via PM if you do)... thanks....

Top
16. January 2006 - 0:16
#3
S1cK!
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
*ED* vs [ZER] e5.cfg 3:0 for *ED*

good game ED, good game ZER, yeha bodz i didnt think it would be that challenging but well, they weren't such a bad clan Tongue

Top
16. January 2006 - 0:46
#4
Weebl
Offline
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts:
*ED* vs [ZER] e5.cfg 3:0 for *ED*

damn thats a lot of frags Tongue

Top
16. January 2006 - 1:00
#5
{D*R*T} BODZ!
XbODz's picture
Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts:
*ED* vs [ZER] e5.cfg 3:0 for *ED*
Weebl wrote:

damn thats a lot of frags Tongue

ye, final result was 1307/885 Winking more than 2000 frags, but nothing exeptionnal for my division Tongue

Top
16. January 2006 - 17:08
#6
akro.
symptom's picture
Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts:
*ED* vs [ZER] e5.cfg 3:0 for *ED*
*RuBeN!* wrote:

Symp... I have already asked you for these graphics... I'm pretty sure you can't have them this way using Quake in-game commands... you said you had a freaky cfg... can you send it to me please (via PM if you do)... thanks....

soryr i dont send my cfgs... Winking i think much playes, have betters cfgs than me...

Top
16. January 2006 - 17:12
#7
akro.
symptom's picture
Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts:
*ED* vs [ZER] e5.cfg 3:0 for *ED*
{D*R*T} BODZ! wrote:

yeah why not posting e5 results here too, nice idea akro Winking

gg zer, they surprised me, i though it wouldn't be so hard

yes ill create here foum for e5 playes too.... comments, topics,and others.... from e5players nice to see here....actually only bro.cfg players write here :!:

Top
16. January 2006 - 18:39
#8
S3c|¯3¯|¯ [EN]
Secret's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts:
*ED* vs [ZER] e5.cfg 3:0 for *ED*
{D*R*T} BODZ! wrote:

Weebl wrote:
damn thats a lot of frags Tongue

ye, final result was 1307/885 Winking more than 2000 frags

Thats typical in e5 weebl Winking its excessive Big grin
And the TDM wars in e5 are limited by 20min... and not by 200 frags like in bro... that also causes higher scores...

Highest EN got in a 3 map TDM war yet was 2051:1311...
But Im sure that can be topped without a big problem...
Getting 1000 frags in a map isnt a too big problem in (original) excessive...

@ topic...

gg ED and Zer...

I see Zer is really doing well as newcomers in excessive Big grin n1!

!!newest e6 (E+1.04)!!
e6 (E+1.03)

Top
16. January 2006 - 19:49
#9
S1cK!
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
*ED* vs [ZER] e5.cfg 3:0 for *ED*

Yeah your right Secret Laughing it isnt that hard, but it really sucks when every player is have jump lags, a few of ZER sometimes had 400, but i think ED was worst of with pings, but we still managed to beat them, Yeah Seeing as Zer is a new clan they are doing really well Big grin keep it up Big grin

Top
16. January 2006 - 20:39
#10
akro.
symptom's picture
Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts:
*ED* vs [ZER] e5.cfg 3:0 for *ED*

Highest EN got in a 3 map TDM war yet was 2051:1311...

we dont play second map with frgalimit 20, coz ruoters of servers ENs r restarted, and we played near 11 minutes... so we cant give this high scores....

Top