wrote:

gG both! i hope you will play it more and more.. i wish.. nice to see sneaky in that kind of cw. gl

Everytime I want to post my thoughs here, I face a problem that nobody actually gives a shit about what I say and moreover I don't realy give a shit about a problem I would like to say and I don't write anything.

I'm not often entering any dialogue including Milena vs Mzi/zarzyn/ terror, because every discussion between you is a stupidness from the first side, and huge butthurt from the other side, nothing personal it's exactly how it looks from the spect.

But well, we r talking serious shits now, so I would like to point one thing. I understand you, mzi, in questions related to the railmania. Yes, personally I take it as a shit config too. I understand there realy a big difference between qlinsta and railmania, and forcing clan from the 1st conf playing 2nd is almost the same like forcing defrag player to play plusN with armors and powerups.

The main interest for me in playing railonly configs is a tactic we could make while we playing against other clans. It's a teamwork, it's a fun we getting in teamspeak and etc. I can't get such addictance to the config. Even if it's clear with railmania, why instead of simple agreement of playing one game on r4e or non-modifed rr and 2nd game on qlinsta, there are always some useless flames?

Most of us are plus players, and no, we aren't suggesting you to play plusN with us, it gonna be extremly boring, you understand. But we accepting your home config, on which you should be definielty stronger as well, and as a good will we just requesting one game on the config we like more (rr or r4e). I believe both games could be intersting, but instead on that I always see - "noobs, we dont play other confs" and "pussyes, stucked only with one conf".

I know why Milena suggesting you railmania as config for a 2nd game, because it will be the victory for us with the same chances of your victory on qlinsta. But I believe in rr/r4e there can be a nice battle, and thats the only thing could be matter. Non-acceptance of such conditions are just out of my understanding. I wish you rethink the case, and both of you do one step for that games.

hm, ok, but i didnt use rcon in that time because i was playing and i think referee didnt use it as well because he was just recording. also i didnt use rcon to change maps because i gave referee password of server to gmz. i'll keep an eye if this problem will occur again

well played both, except milena

wrote:

wrote:

wrote:

gG both! i hope you will play it more and more.. i wish.. nice to see sneaky in that kind of cw. gl

i agree, with the exception that i do understand if one clan prefers to play one cfg only. i personally like to play all cfgs for the same reason as fps. every cfg has its tactical differences and its interesting. while playing plus for example i always thought "a cfg with rail only and bfgs/grens for movement would be awesome". turns out it isnt as great as i expected, but still its quite fun and if some clans choose to prefer this, im in. I also value qlinsta for the more "pro" feel about it, tactics are more important, you have to aim every shot, sound-based shooting seems way more important (a point where i still fail against rly good qlinsta players^^) and so on. if a clan prefers that, im in as well.
but: if a clan is ok with any cfg from my personal point of view (as im ok with any, even e6 lol), it just means more wars - more competition.
what i dislike most is not the preference of any cfg but how it evolves to be a stupid war between clans that could simply ignore each other if they're not willing to play.

f1
I feel exactly same I know I wrote many times that railmania.cfg is failmania but it's acutally cool when I feel like playing it... but I hate when someone is forcing it on me. I can play all railonly configs.

who help me ?why when i watching demo i have a lag on map overkill (fly from wall)???