3DMark Results

37 replies [Last post]
4. May 2010 - 10:55
ASSCARI * DSS
Gohan's picture
Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts:

Post here your 3DMark results Happy Ofc run it in default 3DMark settings Happy

Link for 3DMark 2001SE: http://hotfile.com/dl/35485171/6a48503/3DMark_2001_Full.zip.html
Mine result (with old ATA hdd:P):

1. Trax - 59517
2. Defcon - 47591


3. Zik - 46764


4. kiku - 42365


5. alkin - 39142


6. Ascari - 36 428


7 . alex - 36425


8. beazt - 34231


9. odin - 32419


10. honey - 30891


11. Spartan - 27721


12. skull - 23955


13. Mistress - 7552

Mouse: Logitech mx518
Mousepad: Zowie P-TF SpawN Edition
Headphones: Sennheiser HD202

Top
4. May 2010 - 11:26
#1
officiallydead
Offline
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts:
Re: 3DMark Results

kiku - 42365

Top
4. May 2010 - 12:24
#2
odin [EN]
Offline
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts:
Re: 3DMark Results

lol this old 3dmark runs on some tests worser than on my old geforce 4200ti... may its cause win7(it goves an error when i start it) or this test is just to old for this new grafic cards... donno

well whatever
odin - 32419

Top
4. May 2010 - 12:31
#3
ALEX.K
Offline
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts:
Re: 3DMark Results

36425 3d marks here on default settings. Even tho I dunno what that is xD

Top
4. May 2010 - 12:41
#4
mow Q [EN]
Offline
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts:
Re: 3DMark Results

This is actually 3D Mark Vantage http://www.futuremark.com/benchmarks/3dmarkvantage/download/

No idea why i should run a 9 years old benchmark which isnt up to date. Run the true vantage and not 3Dmark 2001, than u can compare.

Top
4. May 2010 - 13:24
#5
ASSCARI * DSS
Gohan's picture
Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts:
Re: 3DMark Results

Maybe cuz of 39MB size? Happy Its good for quick test. Downloading over 400mb will take much more time.

Also post what pc u got Winking

Mouse: Logitech mx518
Mousepad: Zowie P-TF SpawN Edition
Headphones: Sennheiser HD202

Top
4. May 2010 - 13:28
#6
mow Q [EN]
Offline
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts:
Re: 3DMark Results

well, just saying it, since u claim "vantage" but it is "3D Mark 200" and not "vantage",  well, nvm.

Top
4. May 2010 - 14:15
#7
ASSCARI * DSS
Gohan's picture
Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts:
Re: 3DMark Results

Ye, sry. My mistake. Later will test my pc with this 3dmark which u post Happy

Mouse: Logitech mx518
Mousepad: Zowie P-TF SpawN Edition
Headphones: Sennheiser HD202

Top
4. May 2010 - 14:32
#8
UNREAL
Unreal's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
PL Poland
Re: 3DMark Results
mow Q [EN] wrote:

No idea why i should run a 9 years old benchmark which isnt up to date.

because not everyone can run new 3D Mark..

RONiN wrote:

stage 1) i am in denial that girls exist on the internet, i think everyone is a guy
stage 2) i am in denial that everyone is real, i think you are all advanced bots
stage 3) i am in denial that the world is real, i think i am plugged into a machine
stage 4) i am in denial that machines actually exist, i think this is just one big dream
stage 5) i am in denial that i am capable of dreaming, i think my existence is fake
*poof* everything disappears.

no trickz in my signature anymore

Top
4. May 2010 - 16:38
#9
rUnThEoN?!
Skullheadq3's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
DE Germany
Re: 3DMark Results

23955 @ 33 processes, could rerun at less then 17 though Happy

hurrenson: "This idiot is apparently not familiar with a rail/sniper style."

Top
4. May 2010 - 19:15
#10
potato?@away
Aklin's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts:
Re: 3DMark Results

(no overclocking)
(no rebooting about 45 hours)

Top