!!NEW!! Dicussion Mixed Wars

15 replies [Last post]
9. October 2006 - 14:37
#11
mow Q [EN]
Offline
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts:
!!NEW!! Dicussion Mixed Wars

It is about, if we make for that a rule, we need to make a rule for all little piece of shit.

However.

Top
9. October 2006 - 18:07
#12
{D*R*T} BODZ!
XbODz's picture
Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts:
!!NEW!! Dicussion Mixed Wars

mixed war not allowed is just stupid :

Then when i want to play mixed wars anyway we play 2 maps TDM and 1 min after we play 2 maps TAG the same evening and it counts for 2 wars in total rank :
1 tdm + 1 total ranked and
1 tag + an other total ranked

so 2 Total wars ranked when you played whole maps the same time so with the same war shedulded.

which is exactly proposition 2 but with 2 total wars ranked instead of 1 cauz you did all maps at same time. It's just more logic regrouping all maps and the war in only 1event

Top
11. October 2006 - 0:18
#13
*A*C|_ASS*WON]<O
vroomfoondel's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts:
asfd

k heres my 2 pence worth of thoughts on this issue..i earlier sent a pm to rena suggesting another option..havent gotten a reply..guess hes busy..

neways what i think is the problem with mixed wars arises because of the way the ranking system is structured...and that is that ranking is based on wars..whether you win a war or not..not on HOW you won the war...now this mite sound common-sensical and indeed it is but the problem with mixed wars is a real problem and is one of the situations (dont know any other but some mite exist) in which the ranking system clearly needs work...

so my suggestion was this..instead of ranking based on wars we should have ranking based on maps...simply substitute "you get this many points if u win a war against this clan" with "you get this many points if u win a map against this clan"...fairly straight forward..now u mite say that this is equivalent to saying mixed wars are allowed no matter if only one map of a gametype is played in a war...but theres a big difference..the difference is that the points you gain playing in a gametype is proportional to the number of maps you played..so first off this would favour clans that have won more maps as it should..to me a cw with result 4 - 0 and another with result 2 - 0 should carry different points..and again even if u loose a war to a clan say 2 - 4 u will still be awarded some points unlike the present system in which doesnt matter if u loose 2 - 4 or 0 - 4 u still get no points..so the ranking system will take cognizance of the maps you won even if u lost the cw overall...

this system would make much more sense to me..theres only one problem...we already have a system in place..so if we decide to implement a new system we will have to think about using all the data in the existing ranks and converting it to the new ranks...clearly this wont be easy..and if a clan slides down the ranking system as a result then it mite not like that very much...

neways thats what i think and would like reactions to it...

#e+pickup #excessiveplus #class.clan

Top
11. October 2006 - 1:41
#14
Anonymous
!!NEW!! Dicussion Mixed Wars

Quote:
There was a vote, with a result. Why do you feel the need to understand why people vote the way they vote? Just accept the decision of the community and move on.

couldnt agree more Cool

he has a point maybe other people dont want to give reasons why.
its none of anyones business anyway why he/she voted that way.
Isnt that what a vote is about?

Top
11. October 2006 - 1:51
#15
BUDMAN E+
Budman's picture
Offline
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts:
!!NEW!! Dicussion Mixed Wars

This should have been taken to the active clanleaders. Bah. If we are to have a boatload of rules we should have those scheduling the wars decide the structure. E+ is going to go in the toilet, if peeps don't start getting thier shit together.
If clanleaders want to play mixed wars let them. Let remember this is supposed to be fun.

Am I allowed to say shit in the forums still. SHIT SHIT SHIT!

Anyone got a nakid lady for me to post.

Top