®TAG / DS 2:1 JUMPS / 31.10.2010r.

41 replies [Last post]
1. November 2010 - 17:52
#21
DRINA
Drina's picture
Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts:
Re: TAG / DS 2:1 JUMPS / 31.10.2010r.

Bunch of sore losers, none of this talk would hapen if thay won 2 0.

Top
1. November 2010 - 19:40
#22
!@#$%&*( terror )_
terror's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts:
Re: TAG / DS 2:1 JUMPS / 31.10.2010r.

Hey Happy I see 3 problems:
1. Some player from jumps was kicked by pb.
Seems like he is clean, no evidence of cheats.
2. DS wanted to play 5v5 but rules say that match can be
played 5v5 when both clans agree, so no rule was broken here.
3. Tie map, DS wanted 5v5 on overkill or dm6 4v4,
jumps wanted 4v4 overkill.
Hmmm ... 3rd point is a failure of ref.
I don't actualy give a crap, but ref is present on
match for one reasos: to help.
Not to do whatever he feels like.
IMO ref should give more options with tie map,
wait untill both clans chose map that both
agree to play.

that's my 2 cents

cheers

Top
1. November 2010 - 19:49
#23
JUMPS'FPS!
fps's picture
Offline
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts:
Re: TAG / DS 2:1 JUMPS / 31.10.2010r.

We also suggested dm11 as a tie map. So I think ref did good job and as rule says - he decides what to do in every problematic situation.

Top
1. November 2010 - 20:05
#24
tr1ckhooo
Tricky's picture
Offline
Joined: May 2010
Posts:
Re: TAG / DS 2:1 JUMPS / 31.10.2010r.
DRINA wrote:

Bunch of sore losers, none of this talk would hapen if thay won 2 0.

Right.


Top
1. November 2010 - 20:11
#25
eRRor369
eRRor369's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts:
Re: TAG / DS 2:1 JUMPS / 31.10.2010r.
tr1ckhooo wrote:

DRINA wrote:
Bunch of sore losers, none of this talk would hapen if thay won 2 0.

Right.

Left.

pew pew you're dead

Top
1. November 2010 - 20:41
#26
bazz
Bazz's picture
Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts:
PL Poland
Re: TAG / DS 2:1 JUMPS / 31.10.2010r.

@drina
typical comment of forum troll which wasnt there but want to get attention like .... Happy

Top
1. November 2010 - 20:52
#27
.aNk/xXxp4l/:bR.Shady'XYN!
ShadyAK's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts:
Re: TAG / DS 2:1 JUMPS / 31.10.2010r.

hi im also considered a forum troll but i'd like to say that DS = one of remaining good clans with oldskool feel. U go against DS, you're perpetuating the downfall of e+. c:
Also tgk chet, admin bann plz

[+]

(*WASP*SH▲DOWKNIGHT) wrote:
nonsense repellent declamatory

Top
1. November 2010 - 20:55
#28
DRINA
Drina's picture
Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts:
Re: TAG / DS 2:1 JUMPS / 31.10.2010r.
DRT-Bazz wrote:

@drina
typical comment of forum troll which wasnt there but want to get attention like .... Happy

Oh my 90 posts is clear evidence of forum trolling and attention craving ee... , but anyway the right man spoke, bazz your the bigest sore loser that i know that is mildly said.

Top
1. November 2010 - 21:02
#29
madbringer
Madbringer's picture
Offline
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts:
Re: TAG / DS 2:1 JUMPS / 31.10.2010r.
.aNk/xXxp4l/:bR.Shady'XYN! wrote:

hi im also considered a forum troll but i'd like to say that DS = one of remaining good clans with oldskool feel. U go against DS, you're perpetuating the downfall of e+. c:
Also tgk chet, admin bann plz

Why hello there, i am also a troll, and i hail from Edawn, i'd like to say that DS = an oldschool clan with tons of tradition and lots of really good players and if they're angry about something it's probably because russian Xd plz derp also jumps = pusik. c:

Top
1. November 2010 - 21:15
#30
bazz
Bazz's picture
Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts:
PL Poland
Re: TAG / DS 2:1 JUMPS / 31.10.2010r.
DRINA wrote:

DRT-Bazz wrote:
@drina
typical comment of forum troll which wasnt there but want to get attention like .... Happy

Oh my 90 posts is clear evidence of forum trolling and attention craving ee... , but anyway the right man spoke, bazz your the bigest sore loser that i know that is mildly said.

thats what ive been waiting for Happy first of all look at yourself and truly dont give a fuck about ur opinion
anyway its better to be a game loser then life loser,take the tip

Top