CLAN RANK 2005 - FINAL

16 replies [Last post]

12. June 2006 - 19:23

#11

Offline

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts:

CLAN RANK 2005 - FINAL

I'm not, those are the facts for me. If you see that as sucking up... :roll:

12. June 2006 - 20:12

#12

Offline

Joined: Sep 2005

Posts:

CLAN RANK 2005 - FINAL

gg all !

12. June 2006 - 20:32

#13

Offline

Joined: Sep 2005

Posts:

CLAN RANK 2005 - FINAL

it's nice to see that lime made it into top 10 but of course, well done KO, DRT and MR

~tyrant!~ZoO.ConcreteDonkey

13. June 2006 - 15:19

#14

Offline

Joined: Jul 2005

Posts:

CLAN RANK 2005 - FINAL

gg all.
but its strange. swe played 9 wars, 9 wins, 0 losses.
imo, the ranking system must be built in another way. i know it would be unfair if the rank is defined by the average of wins and losses, aswell. perfect would be if every clan has to fight all others so every clan has the same number of wars played?
or the way worldcup-ranking works to accellerate it -> not that many wars has to be fought (i mean in football, dont know how the rules in e+ worldcup work).
i guess im not the first thinking about it and the way the rank is build atm has some reasons. :
if not maybe its possible to start thinking about it or thinking about it again.

greetz yeah

Yeah! schmeckt einmalig und belebt sofort

13. June 2006 - 20:41

#15

Offline

Joined: Nov 2003

Posts:

CLAN RANK 2005 - FINAL

hi yeah,

maybe u read this forum again, than u think again about ur post, than u can post again

13. June 2006 - 21:16

#16

Offline

Joined: Mar 2004

Posts:

CLAN RANK 2005 - FINAL

To play 1 game and win = 100%
Nobody can beat that!

To keep things interesting and 'forcing' clans to play a pointsystem is a must.
Perhaps the 3 points for a win, 1 for a draw and 0 for a loss aint that bad...
But then u might need restrictions of how many times u can play a sertain clan...
Not two games against same clan in a row is simple enough?

Iiiik... second half of Brazil vs Croatia has begun!
gtg

Bättre pissa i stuprännan än stupa i pissrännan !