®CW (FTAG) // sNeAkY 2 : 0 RSQT // 25.09.2012

17 replies [Last post]
alienM
alienM's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts:

.:: 1st map: overkill (sNeAkY's map) ::.
*SNEAKY*BASTARDS 15 - 10 R5QT
.:: 2nd map: cpm14 (RSQT's map) ::.
*SNEAKY*BASTARDS 17 - 10 R5QT

.:: Gametype: FTAG 4vs4 ::.
.:: Timelimit: 15 ::.
.:: Fraglimit: 0 ::.
.:: FriendlyFire: 0 ::.
.:: Config: r4e09f.cfg ::.
.:: Pure: Enabled ::.
.:: Punkbuster: Enabled ::.
.:: Server: -C4- War Server ::.
.:: Ref+: ::.

Login or register to view attached files

Rayden was here
georgekotz's picture
Offline
Joined: May 2010
Posts:
Re: CW (FTAG) // sNeAkY 2 : 0 RSQT // 25.09.2012

GG Sneaky
Sneaky performance as always Happy
And Milena too bad you want only to win and let 1 of our player spec for that. We could make 5vs5 but it seems you take the game tooo seriusly but anyway.
And thx rock for your time

Real life is more important then Virtual life
Dont forget that

alienM
alienM's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts:
Re: CW (FTAG) // sNeAkY 2 : 0 RSQT // 25.09.2012
Rayden was here wrote:

GG Sneaky
Sneaky performance as always Happy
And Milena too bad you want only to win and let 1 of our player spec for that. We could make 5vs5 but it seems you take the game tooo seriusly but anyway.
And thx rock for your time

I would play if we didn't had already 4 players, really! Today I played both maps on TwT CW when we didn't had players. You know me, I always spect when other mates are there, no matter hard or easy opponent. Anyway I don't remember when last time we played 5 vs 5. It's more for FWs, then for CWs. But, anyhow well played both! Was nice and unexpected CW, when you want call us for revenge! Tongue

THC * ZYDEK
Zydas's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts:
Re: CW (FTAG) // sNeAkY 2 : 0 RSQT // 25.09.2012
alienM wrote:

Rayden was here wrote:
GG Sneaky
Sneaky performance as always Happy
And Milena too bad you want only to win and let 1 of our player spec for that. We could make 5vs5 but it seems you take the game tooo seriusly but anyway.
And thx rock for your time

I would play if we didn't had already 4 players, really! Today I played both maps on TwT CW when we didn't had players. You know me, I always spect when other mates are there, no matter hard or easy opponent. Anyway I don't remember when last time we played 5 vs 5. It's more for FWs, then for CWs. But, anyhow well played both! Was nice and unexpected CW, when you want call us for revenge! Tongue

np Happy

JUMPS'FPS!
fps's picture
Offline
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts:
Re: CW (FTAG) // sNeAkY 2 : 0 RSQT // 25.09.2012

GG!

rage+
Forum moderator
Zack's picture
Offline
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts:
Re: CW (FTAG) // sNeAkY 2 : 0 RSQT // 25.09.2012

Gg )

*ZMB*INEED$*
spraw's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts:
Re: CW (FTAG) // sNeAkY 2 : 0 RSQT // 25.09.2012

gg) was fun to play. I always forget that there is a /mute command. Chatterbox

alienM
alienM's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts:
Re: CW (FTAG) // sNeAkY 2 : 0 RSQT // 25.09.2012

Thank you Rock for your time spent on reffing in those late hours. We probably wouldn't find another ref in that time. It was your first time in that "role" and you managed it perfectly. Happy
>>> MVDs <<<

DRINA
Drina's picture
Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts:
Re: CW (FTAG) // sNeAkY 2 : 0 RSQT // 25.09.2012
Rayden was here wrote:

GG Sneaky
Sneaky performance as always Happy
And Milena too bad you want only to win and let 1 of our player spec for that. We could make 5vs5 but it seems you take the game tooo seriusly but anyway.
And thx rock for your time

Relax, playing 5v5 makes the game messy and at least 2 of sneaky members don't want to play 5v5, not including AlienM.
And don't blame people for them wanting to win lol, everybody wants to win.

THC * ZYDEK
Zydas's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts:
Re: CW (FTAG) // sNeAkY 2 : 0 RSQT // 25.09.2012
DRINA wrote:

Rayden was here wrote:
GG Sneaky
Sneaky performance as always Happy
And Milena too bad you want only to win and let 1 of our player spec for that. We could make 5vs5 but it seems you take the game tooo seriusly but anyway.
And thx rock for your time

Relax, playing 5v5 makes the game messy and at least 2 of sneaky members don't want to play 5v5, not including AlienM.
And don't blame people for them wanting to win lol, everybody wants to win.

everybody wants to win, everybody wants to play( not sitting in spec), everybody wants play for fun/just wants Tongue.

ps: nvm Happy, u won. GG one more time.

3m'genesis
G3n3sis's picture
Offline
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts:
Re: CW (FTAG) // sNeAkY 2 : 0 RSQT // 25.09.2012
alienM wrote:

Rayden was here wrote:
GG Sneaky
Sneaky performance as always Happy
And Milena too bad you want only to win and let 1 of our player spec for that. We could make 5vs5 but it seems you take the game tooo seriusly but anyway.
And thx rock for your time

You know me, I always spect when other mates are there, no matter hard or easy opponent.

ye say that to epsi...