ash, please dont rise stuff out of context.

I said "if we get fooled again...", than we deny to play any further CTF4 map

It was LSF blaming us, not we LSF. Got it? Additional, it is offtopic.

We dont treat people unfair, but if we get treaten unfair we are not allowed to speak? Ok, if this is ur oppinion dear ash

Anyhow, please just dont abuse my posts on a other meaning as they was spoken. thx.

The rule didn't exist before this round. It's fucking obvious it doesn't apply to the games already played. Why such ridiculous reactions, serously :roll:

--

ps: Consider these games would be on gtv, the whole demo thing is pure bullshit, imo. (if it wasn't too much hussle to setup it and actually tame all the bugs)

wrote:

Ok then, if you want to abuse my mistake (in not posting 100% foolproof rules) i can as well abuse your mistake.

The war has to be replayed because PURE was 0. That rule was there since start.

Or you can post the demos.

short question
where is the rule that the war has to be played pure?
so far its just a notranked/ranked and yellow card for poster as long as he doesnt proof that its lem mistake.

It says the war must be ranked.

In order for a war to be ranked the game MUST be pb and pure 1.

PB and PURE were made mandatory since start of 2008, as it was written in one of the rules discussion topics.

Due to college i still didnt post the updated rules of engagement, but they are in effect (and can be gathered from the rules discussion threads)

It wasnt, but it should have been. I had 4 exams during those days and i posted the rules i could remember at the moment. Thats one rule that had to be there, but i forgot it.

When DA asked me will i allow the war even though it was pure 0, i said "sure, a mistake like that can happen to anyone".

Now that a mistake like that hapened to me, they wont let it rest, they keep on pushing.

That grattitude i guess